70soghuBMoj(ld!L!~~_7.JPG "merehazle"){kind=avatar}
The Police have warned the public not to approach this man seen leaving a building in disguise 
I thought he was going to mention Mohammed Ahmed Mohamed. (likes wearing burkas
)
Never mind perhaps some other time Yes you see the news. Others did too.
@charliebird123 wrote:They must have spotted him?
Yes that's the story charlie.
And we hardly need to guess what the OP' is on about. And hopefully the OP' wont mind us saying a thing or two about it on here rather than starting another thread?
In the Commons Mrs May insisted Mohamed does not pose a direct threat to the British public even though the 27-year-old is understood to have received training and fought overseas for al-Shabaab, the Somalia-based cell of the militant Islamist group al Qaida.
To laughs and shouts from the Labour benches, Mrs May said: ''The police and the security service have confirmed that they do not believe that this man poses a direct threat to the public in the UK. She also said: ''If they run away, they run away'' Oh, alright then Theresa ALL problems solved?!
Well ALL is alright then Theresa? We believe you ............................ 
@*.*..lola..*.* wrote:The international security services claim to have 'overwhelmingly strong' intelligence linking this character to terrorist activities - you say I don't know that he has done anything wrong, well equally you don't know that he hasn't.
Are you suggesting that the police are just picking on some poor innocent person at random without a shred of evidence?
Yes I am glad that the government are adopting a 'better safe than sorry approach' to our national security and I wish they had even more powers TBH as clearly the powers they currently have are not good enough.
He made his own choices about the company he keeps and the way he chooses to live his life
I'm sorry if you think I'm being harsh but frankly I couldn't give a rat's rear-end about the human rights of terrorists...suspected or otherwise!
Yes very well said lola.
POST 14 Oh dear!
@*.*..lola..*.* wrote:The international security services claim to have 'overwhelmingly strong' intelligence linking this character to terrorist activities - you say I don't know that he has done anything wrong, well equally you don't know that he hasn't.
Are you suggesting that the police are just picking on some poor innocent person at random without a shred of evidence?
Yes I am glad that the government are adopting a 'better safe than sorry approach' to our national security and I wish they had even more powers TBH as clearly the powers they currently have are not good enough.
He made his own choices about the company he keeps and the way he chooses to live his life
I'm sorry if you think I'm being harsh but frankly I couldn't give a rat's rear-end about the human rights of terrorists...suspected or otherwise!
Yes very well said lola.
POST 14 Oh dear!
Creeky, I don't honestly think that its humanly possible for me to care any less about this Mohammed character than I already do. I thought I made that crystal clear in my previous post.
Therefore I'm a tad baffled as to why you would think that ranting at me in red font would somehow change that ....how bizarre?
Anyway, I do respect your right to hold a differing view point to my own but I'm not sure that droning on about it on some obscure eBay chat forum will actually help to change anything.
If you genuinely feel that strongly about it, why don't you start your own online petition:
You could try to lobby support for fairer treatment of suspected terrorists currently residing in the UK or somesuch - I'm sure the British public would be falling over themselves to sign it.....good luck 
