I'm sorry if the red font upset you - simply a tool to differentiate my response to your post - sub-conscious indication of anger? Possibly.

As for being a rant - well that's your interpretation but calling a measured response a rant doesn't make it so and maybe puts the lie to your claim for it not to be "humanly possible for me to care any less about this Mohammed character"   -   you patently do care.

You may be baffled as to why I have responded - a standard way of illustrating 'bafflement' is to use multiple question marks - maybe with that information you could go back and look where I have used them.

As for petitions I don't need to start one, there already is one.  I suppose at least we should be thankful that criticism of the earlier control orders which allowed for imprisonment without trial saw such orders replaced by TPIMs.  Hopefully these will be repealed as well and replaced with evidence gathering measures that will see the public protected by dangerous people being lawfully convicted. 

Regrettably there is a real danger that politicians will take the opportunity this case has presented to regain the earlier powers - the 'public' do appear to share your view, if the online poll by the Daily Express is reflective of their views - the question asked was, "Do the laws surrounding British terrorism suspects need tightening up?" - the yes vote was 93.1%

In conclusion I would just leave you with this - When councils have been found using powers granted under 'ant-terror' legislation, against ordinary citizens and even right wing media such as the DM describe these laws as 'Big Brother' ones then it is time to worry.