---

@*.*..lola..*.* wrote:

I think you'll find that's not 'quite' true - certainly not in this case as far as I can see.
'Innocent until proven guilty' flies out the window

 

I wonder how that poor innocent little mite found himself in the middle of an Al Queda run terrorist training camp, Creeky?

 

Maybe he mistook if for some kind of corporate team-building event eh? 

 

Naawww... bless!

---

I don't know if he did - do you?

If he did I don't know if he did anything wrong - do you?

If there is evidence that this guy has done anything wrong then put him in front of a court and let him be proven guilty of his crimes and then by all means lock him away.

The whole idea that a citizen can be limited in their movements, restricted in their activities and told who they can meet by a politician, without any of the claimed "evidence" being tested, stinks in my opinion.

Maybe you are one of the very few who believe that politicians never do anything other than what is in the best interest of the majority and can be 100% trusted to always do the 'right thing' then fine - I however, (and I suspect the vast majority of people), am not in that camp!