Buyer Protection Fee?

First my apologies to the powers that be.  Apparently I posted this on the wrong board, so I repeat it here to ensure it reaches the "proper" audience.

 

I am trying to discern the rationale for the implementation of ebay's new BPF policy which seems to involve:

  • a requirement to rid ebay of private sellers – especially those who specialise in low volume, low value commodities,
  • an opportunity to increase the cash flowing through the system, to hold on to, and benefit from, funds rightfully belonging belonging to sellers, for up to two weeks,
  • an attempt to nudge businesses currently registered as “private”, to reregister as businesses,
  • all of the above.

 

Trying to discourage the low volume/low vale private seller is a denial of its own origin.  Such sellers, with their, often loyal, buyers, are the foundation for the success of ebay as a marketplace and should not be abandoned.

Holding on to funds unnecessarily was a commercial trick used in the past by all banks and financial institutions that was discredited by law long ago - which is why CHAPS payments (for example) now take 24 hours instead of up to 10 days.

Moving businesses registered as “private” on to business accounts is a legitimate aspiration, but surely can be managed in a more subtle, less confrontational way.

 

Buyers from registered Business sellers are exempted from this tax.  Does this mean such sellers are less likely to deliberately try to defraud a buyer and/or that business sellers are less likely to  be subjected to fraudulent claims?

Now buyers are from private sellers are being made to pay a fee protecting their payments (with the inevitable effect on total cost of their purchases - hugely exaggerated on low cost items), but do they actually get any extra protection on payment of this fee.  My experience suggests up to 4/4/25, buyers were automatically refunded for all reported non-receipt or damaged goods with no opportunity for sellers to dispute potentially fraudulent claims.

 

There is a huge amount of dissent (and minimal approval) on the community pages, which in all probability  reflects a small proportion of the overall dissatisfaction out there.  Is ebay monitoring and listening to what is being said?  Will there be any reaction?

 

I suspect not.

Message 1 of 8
See Most Recent
7 REPLIES 7

Buyer Protection Fee?

Eloquent, I like it.

& I think what we're seeing is as simple as some "big thinkers" getting "big ideas" that were totally beyond their capabilities.

 

That's why we now have the Sistine Chapel of corporate *bleep* ups in the new "Offer" system.

 

Why VAT details have been removed from business sellers, why the invoice system has gone bye bye.

 

Why they've managed to *bleep* off the group of users that Jamie is on record as saying are the most important to their business. The buyer/sellers.

 

Basically this is what happens to businesses that are run by greedy, dumb people.

Message 2 of 8
See Most Recent

Buyer Protection Fee?

Maybe the powers that be are MAGAs?

Message 3 of 8
See Most Recent

Buyer Protection Fee?

Well if they are they can *bleep* right off if they think they're going to get my rare minerals too ...

Message 4 of 8
See Most Recent

Buyer Protection Fee?

Sorry - you lost me.  MAGA???

Message 5 of 8
See Most Recent

Buyer Protection Fee?

As far as I understand it, eBay adds the BPF to the Final Value. Add postage. If selling to the States add the American sales tax, and eBay charges sellers 10% of the Grand Total which can be many times more than the Final Value bid. 

Message 6 of 8
See Most Recent

Buyer Protection Fee?


@mibr2002 wrote:

Sorry - you lost me.  MAGA???


Make America Great Again, AKA Trump and Musk disciples.

Message 7 of 8
See Most Recent

Buyer Protection Fee?

I suppose the imposition of a unwanted, unnecessary, discriminatory tariff on friends/clients is exactly what an imbecile would do.

Message 8 of 8
See Most Recent
Got selling related questions? Start here: