The Glitter has sunk to a new low.

[cee-dee]

http://news.sky.com/story/1276196/gary-glitter-charged-with-child-sex-offences

I wondered how long it'd be!

[**bustysinclaire**]

Well, why not? the two are just self gratification of sexual desires.

[saasher2012]

One fundamental difference , it is not against the law for two consenting adults it is for a this other CRIME!. & to compare the two not only is ridiculous but also very hurtful to some posters!.

[upthecreekyetagain]

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

Well, why not? the two are just self gratification of sexual desires.

---

That's as maybe - it's not the self-gratification that is offensive though but the age of one of the participants.

[**bustysinclaire**]

I think there are double standards here, one group are allowed their sexual perversions to the point that it is classed as acceptable,  yet the other not to the point that it is commiting a hanus crime. What is the man to do? control his urges? then IMHO so should the other group.

[saasher2012]

I repeat one is a crime against a child! & once again you are trying to force your faith into a thread!.

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@saasher2012 wrote:
One fundamental difference , it is not against the law for two consenting adults it is for a this other CRIME!. & to compare the two not only is ridiculous but also very hurtful to some posters!.

---

I am only stating my opinion saasher, of course I would not wish to hurt any posters feelings, a bit like you stating your opinion on subjects close to my heart, but I am sure you would have no intention on hurting my feelings xx

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@saasher2012 wrote:
I repeat one is a crime against a child! & once again you are trying to force your faith into a thread!.

---

I just thought there was freedom for all to post here, and just stated my opinion. Am I excluded from posting?

[saasher2012]

I would hope not, you are entitled to your opinions like I am but this thread is about a man who has been convicted before & is now facing more charges from way back ,It has as far as I know nothing to do with same sex relationships which I repeat in this country nowadays is not against the law, so in fact you are hurting peoples feelings , you have your own opinion & have voiced them before based on your faith,

[tommy.irene]

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

---

@saasher2012 wrote:
I repeat one is a crime against a child! & once again you are trying to force your faith into a thread!.

---

I just thought there was freedom for all to post here, and just stated my opinion. Am I excluded from posting?

---

No... But your saying its ok to have sex with children.. is this your faiths teachings..

[saasher2012]

Thanks Tommy I didn't want to say that but that's what I meant. X

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@saasher2012 wrote:
I would hope not, you are entitled to your opinions like I am but this thread is about a man who has been convicted before & is now facing more charges from way back ,It has as far as I know nothing to do with same sex relationships which I repeat in this country nowadays is not against the law, so in fact you are hurting peoples feelings , you have your own opinion & have voiced them before based on your faith,

---

mmmmmmm, actually your point about the law I have to accept.

I will also make it clear I am in noway galloping to defend this man's perverted crimes against children either, it is most abhorrent.

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@tommy.irene wrote:

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

---

@saasher2012 wrote:
I repeat one is a crime against a child! & once again you are trying to force your faith into a thread!.

---

I just thought there was freedom for all to post here, and just stated my opinion. Am I excluded from posting?

---

No... But your saying its ok to have sex with children.. is this your faiths teachings..

---

Did I say that? I most definately did not. And I do believe you know I did not say that too.

[saasher2012]

You may not have meant it but the way you compared the two made it come across that way! & believe me it was a bad comparison to make especially when it involves a child.

[tommy.irene]

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

---

@tommy.irene wrote:

---

No... But your saying its ok to have sex with children.. is this your faiths teachings..

---

Did I say that? I most definately did not. And I do believe you know I did not say that too.

---

Whats the smiley wink for ..As i sayed before your lost ..they got the 144000 in 1935 and you have nowere to go now.. 

[tommy.irene]

It would be nice if people were sober when they write on these threads..

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@tommy.irene wrote:

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

---

@tommy.irene wrote:

---

No... But your saying its ok to have sex with children.. is this your faiths teachings..

---

Did I say that? I most definately did not. And I do believe you know I did not say that too.

---

Whats the smiley wink for ..As i sayed before your lost ..they got the 144000 in 1935 and you have nowere to go now.. 

---

Sorry tommy but I though this thread was about certain perversions of a sexual nature, as saasher says, this thread was not for anything else. The smiley was purely to let you know I knew you knew.

[saasher2012]

lol. It's not me I've only had coffee & water all day !

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@saasher2012 wrote:
lol. It's not me I've only had coffee & water all day !

---

Me too, but I put whiskey in mine xx

[tommy.irene]

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

I am surprised you all condemn this man, surely as he can't help himself and would argue he was born like. So if he can't help himself and was born like it it must be allright to do it?

---

As i said ..you think its ok to have sex with children..

[**bustysinclaire**]

---

@tommy.irene wrote:

---

@**bustysinclaire** wrote:

I am surprised you all condemn this man, surely as he can't help himself and would argue he was born like. So if he can't help himself and was born like it it must be allright to do it?

---

As i said ..you think its ok to have sex with children..

---

I think you think I said that but in actual fact I said no such thing.

---

saasher2012 wrote: I would hope not, you are entitled to your opinions like I am but this thread is about a man who has been convicted before & is now facing more charges from way back ,It has as far as I know nothing to do with same sex relationships which I repeat in this country nowadays is not against the law, so in fact you are hurting peoples feelings , you have your own opinion & have voiced them before based on your faith,

---

mmmmmmm, actually your point about the law I have to accept.

I will also make it clear I am in noway galloping to defend this man's perverted crimes against children either, it is most abhorrent.