Girl, 11, will be Britain's youngest mother .

[tommy.irene]

Girl, 11, will be Britain's youngest mother

A girl is to become Britain's youngest mother after becoming pregnant at 11.

The girl smokes 20 cigarettes a day despite being eight months' pregnant. She conceived aged 11 when she lost her virginity to a boy of 15 on a drunken night out with friends.

The 15-year-old has since been charged with **bleep** by police, and is due to appear again at Edinburgh sheriff court on July 10.

Her 34-year-old mother, who gave birth to her youngest child eight months ago, said she was 'proud' of her daughter.

She will be 12 years and 8 months when she has the child next month. Jenny Teague, Britain's youngest mother until now, was a month older when she gave birth in 1997.

How can we best tackle this problem? Tell us in reader comments below

The youngster, who lives near Edinburgh, says looking after her younger brothers has prepared her for motherhood.

But the girl admits she "panics and cries" when babies are unwell and does not feel able to bathe them.

The mother-to-be, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had unprotected sex with the teenage boy, who also cannot be identified, while drunk last August.

'Excited'

She told the Sun: "I didn't think I'd get pregnant because it was my first time. But I'm really excited and looking forward to being a mum.

"I can't wait to take the baby swimming and out for walks in the pram. I think I'll be able to cope as I've had lots of practice looking after my brothers.

"I know how to feed a baby its bottle and I can change nappies. But I panic and cry if they're sick and I don't like giving them a bath because I'm a bit frightened.

"It's good to know I'll have my mum here to help me if I need her."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-385968/Girl-11-Britains-youngest-mother.html#ixzz2lfH2vEsa 

[**caution**opinion_ahead]

Goodness, GN!  How many email addys do you have?  I have trouble keeping track of 2!

I think the idea behind not using 2 ids on one thread is so people don't come in and back themselves up where they happen to be losing the argument.  Code 42s are different altogether.  I almost did one myself yesterday, as I had been on my buying id, which I do not use to post, and forgot to change clothes.  I had got as far as typing a response and was just about to add a smiley from one of my libraries when I realised.  It wouldn't particularly have mattered, as it was my first post on that thread.  But even if it had not been, it would have been done through error not design.

[**caution**opinion_ahead]

Ah, Lola, you snuck in there whilst I was typing.

*agrees wiv Lola*

[tommy.irene]

---

@spawnjohnuk wrote:

does it matter when no trouble is caused cd ?

---

yes trouble is caused ..when a person replys with 2 ids .. we have Jeckel and Hide.. This should not be allowed when posting and answering on a thread......thanks CD for picking them out i though i was talking to 2 differnt people..

[tommy.irene]

GOD SAVE US. THIS SNAKE WAS FOUND IN THE MOUNTAINS OF HONDURAS . AND THE BIBLE SPEAKS OF A SNAKE WITH 7 HEADS AND WITH THIS WE SEE THAT IT IS FULFILLING EVERYTHING THAT IS WRITTEN . LORD HAVE MERCY ON OUR SOUL'S.

[*.*..lola..*.*]

I think the idea behind not using 2 ids on one thread is so people don't come in and back themselves up where they happen to be losing the argument.

Absolutely, Caution - why do people do that I wonder?

Do they seriously think that no one notices they are using multiple IDs to agree with themselves... OMG cringe cringe cringe  

I'm not sure why Busty needs so many different IDs but as I said before, in this particular instance, I think it was genuinely a case of being signed in on the wrong ID

[cee-dee]

"What I do find quite strange is that you have such a long list of them."

Ah, that's from page, errrr..... 1242, eBay database.

[tommy.irene]

The only one i remember is  Forum Decorum, people should tell people on here when they change ids.. or have they something to hide..

[cee-dee]

Changing IDs is fine, after all, there's the "ID history" to check out if anyone felt the need.

What is disturbing is people creating umpteen IDs for no other purpose that posting something "on the QT" for some reason best known to themselves.

[tommy.irene]

---

@cee-dee wrote:

Changing IDs is fine, after all, there's the "ID history" to check out if anyone felt the need.

What is disturbing is people creating umpteen IDs for no other purpose that posting something "on the QT" for some reason best known to themselves.

---

There is something strange going on.. maybe its the JW way.

[**forum-decorum**]

Caution, I have 2 ID's **bustysinclaire** which I have always had, and This one Golden*nugget so 2 email addys. Although I have access to OH's as well. He hasn't a clue about puters so I do any putering for him.

All other Id's have been closed. I have never been banned and been a naughty girl and open others when I shouldn't either lol.

IMHO we all have strange ways, lol. Variety is the spice of life they say.

[tommy.irene]

---

@golden*nugget28 wrote:

Caution, I have 2 ID's **bustysinclaire** which I have always had, and This one Golden*nugget so 2 email addys. Although I have access to OH's as well. He hasn't a clue about puters so I do any putering for him.

All other Id's have been closed. I have never been banned and been a naughty girl and open others when I shouldn't either lol.

IMHO we all have strange ways, lol. Variety is the spice of life they say.

---

Why didnt you you use the edit button when you posted with the wrong id.. You know i dont believe a word you say..

[cee-dee]

When I was a kid, my father used to say that liars had to have an excellent memory but if you always told the truth, you didn't need a memory like that.

[tommy.irene]

The youngest girl to give birth was 5 years old...
Regardless of our squeamishness, we have to note that the claim of a five-year-old girl giving birth is apparently true. Her name was Lina Medina, a Peruvian girl from the Andean village of Ticrapo who made medical history when she gave birth to a boy by caesarean section in May 1939 at the age of five years, seven months and 21 days. Lina's parents initially thought their daughter had a large abdominal tumor, but after they took her to a hospital in the town of Pisco physicians confirmed that her abdominal swelling was due to pregnancy. Lina was eventually transferred to a hospital in Lima, where she delivered a six-pound baby boy by Cesarean section on 14 May 1939 (coincidentally the date on which Mother's Day was celebrated that year). Lina's father was temporarily jailed on suspicion of incest, but he was released for a lack of evidence and authorities were never able to determine who fathered Lina's child. 

[**forum-decorum**]

Well actually tommy, I did try as soon as I noticed I had posted with busty but the link for editing wasn't there.

Like now on my Golden*nugget posts I only have,

• Mark as new
• Bookmark
• Subscribe
•  Subscribe to RSS feed
• Highlight

     Print

• Email to a Friend
• Report Inappropriate Content

On exploring why I couldn't edit I learnt that we only have a limited time to do so.

But of course Tommy, with all posts I cannot make you believe. I am sorry about that but there you go.

[saasher2012]

With respect! You could have posted your mistake!!

[tommy.irene]

---

@golden*nugget28 wrote:

Well actually tommy, I did try as soon as I noticed I had posted with busty but the link for editing wasn't there.

Like now on my Golden*nugget posts I only have,

• Mark as new
• Bookmark
• Subscribe
•  Subscribe to RSS feed
• Highlight

     Print

• Email to a Friend
• Report Inappropriate Content

On exploring why I couldn't edit I learnt that we only have a limited time to do so.

But of course Tommy, with all posts I cannot make you believe. I am sorry about that but there you go.

---

So you could say ,sorry i posted with the wrong id..

[**forum-decorum**]

Yes, I suppose I could have done.

But really, it was no big deal to me, as I have stated earlier most long term posters know both ID's, on this particular thread/topic as all that had been posting I recognised as long term posters. I (wrongly now) assumed it was common knowledge.

I really didn't see the need to apologise, as to me I wasn't doing anything wrong I certainly wasn't being rude or offensive.

And with respect I still don't see a need to, my posts are just posts concerning a certain topic which ever I post with.

Apart from  one or two lovely posters who do interact with me which ever ID I post on then my posts are usually just one or two off's ones, on a topic, and left at that. So the could actually be posted by individuals whch didn't matter in the slightest.

Any interactions where my posts become more than the one or two  are because some other posters (regs mostly) feel the need to try and show me in a bad light as a JW, not many kindly praising.

I don't mean that in an offensive way either as they are of course entitled to their opinion as I am.

Thankfully I am not easily offended myself, I used to describe myself as having rhyno hide lol. I do like a good debate and a nice conversation even if my views are opposed.

[saasher2012]

Once again with respect! I am not a regular poster & I was very confused. As you say everyone is entitled to their opinion. You may not feel you have to apologise & I respect that decision, but it may have gone along way to diffuse the situation for everyone?

[**forum-decorum**]

Point taken saasher. I do apologise for confusing you.

As my busty post is concerned though, I really cannot see what it contained to be viewed as confusing. It was just very basic comments. It could quite easily have been another poster.

The only issue that came about was a code 42, which was actually pointed out by a reg, who in my opinion knew what/why he/she posted about it for. They do in my opinion seemed to have had an alteria motive, you then would have been none the wiser and would have carried on lurking and reading not knowing and it would not have had any impact on the thread at all.

It would just have seemed like 2 different posters.

That said I want to repeat, it was not my intention to make it look that way it just happened that I made a post with my main ID, it happens from time to time. In no way can my post be made to look as though one is trying to fool others into thinking there is a sinister reason behind it.

Thank you though for your post saasher, I appreciate what you have pointed out to me, and I accept it was respectfully posted too. I hope you don't mind smilies, sometimes they can help to make a post come across as friendly. Others though feel that they are not genuine sentiments, but this one is.

[saasher2012]

Thank you for your apology . I have enjoyed lurking as I'm sure other newbies have, I cannot speak for others but I am not interested in inner politics & have a mind & opinions of my own. I look forward to further debates.