16-04-2025 10:15 AM
I list a few things on ebay occasionally, but this new simple delivery is just rubbish for sellers. It assumes that ebay actually know the size and weight of items And that everyone can easily get to Evri or other courier services easily. Why did they have to stop the seller from deciding how to post items? Put me right off bothering to use Ebay.
Solved! Go to Solution.
24-09-2025 4:11 PM
Try the thread "No longer selling due to Simple Delivery" by Rugbyguy1960 This thread has been going since 31st March 2025, has 9142 replies and 458 pages! I think you might find it interesting.
24-09-2025 4:14 PM
I could be completely wrong but judging by your ID you sell Records from Scotland ?...Anyway the point I want to make is Simple Delivery forces the use of Evri. Evri whilst they will accept Records (Vinyl Records) for sending they exempt them from loss or damage compensation. In short sending Lp's or Singles with Evri via Ebay's simple Delivery is an "at your own risk" situation.
Added to that the fact that only items valued at £20 or less should be sent with Evri makes it a mystery why Ebay would go into partnership with the worst courier company on the planet ?.
Why are Ebay therefore forcing the use of a courier company which takes no responsibility for the goods it accepts for transit ?.
24-09-2025 4:48 PM
@punkwroc77 wrote:I could be completely wrong but judging by your ID you sell Records from Scotland ?...Anyway the point I want to make is Simple Delivery forces the use of Evri. Evri whilst they will accept Records (Vinyl Records) for sending they exempt them from loss or damage compensation. In short sending Lp's or Singles with Evri via Ebay's simple Delivery is an "at your own risk" situation.
Added to that the fact that only items valued at £20 or less should be sent with Evri makes it a mystery why Ebay would go into partnership with the worst courier company on the planet ?.
Why are Ebay therefore forcing the use of a courier company which takes no responsibility for the goods it accepts for transit ?.
Under the terms for Simple Delivery compensation/protection against loss or damage in transit is provided by eBay not the carrier, so that part of Evri's terms is not relevant. Items are covered for their full value provided they are eligible for Simple Delivery (Buy it now or auction start price of £750 or less and not a prohibited item).
24-09-2025 4:58 PM
24-09-2025 7:36 PM
24-09-2025 7:45 PM
24-09-2025 8:03 PM
I do have to laugh at the number of people/sellers who complain about SD when it's a problem of their own making.
25-09-2025 12:12 AM
Explain why it is a problem of own making. Ebay introduced it as a revenue stream. Sellers had no input.
25-09-2025 6:32 AM - edited 25-09-2025 6:33 AM
Explain why it is a problem of own making …..
I’m surprised it needs explaining - the answer is in just about every, if not all, threads concerning Simple Delivery (SD).
There are a number of sellers who do not need to use SD but continue to choose to do so - and then have the audacity to complain about having to use it.
That situation is of their own making.
Have a good day.
25-09-2025 7:26 AM
25-09-2025 7:42 AM
@books1ecb wrote:
This must the longest thread on EBAY ever.
Two recent real examples. Customer ordered two items but separate checkouts. Normally I would combine them and buy a single postage label. EBAY however auto-issues 2 labels to rip off our customers.
Thankfully one was listed pre SD rip off, so I simply refunded the postage charge for that one and sent both with EBAY's SD label. Lucky!
Next day same again different customer - managed to get them to make them COLLECT so I could refund the labels, and delivered them for free as they lived on my shopping route. Again extra work and complexity for sellers, but at least it meant this customer was not also ripped off by SD.
Good Customer Service is not longer an EBAY priority
25-09-2025 7:50 AM
Apologies no idea what happened when I tried to reply to one of your posts and I must have just touched on Reply , please Ignore my post above.
I was trying to say this....
wrote:
Thankfully one was listed pre SD rip off, so I simply refunded the postage charge for that one and sent both with EBAY's SD label. Lucky!
Combining postage is still an issue with Simple Delivery there's no denying that, but you personally, do not have to refund any unused SD postage.
For SD labels once generated but not used refunds are made as follows:
Sorry, again for the confusion, my bad !
😐
25-09-2025 8:11 AM
25-09-2025 9:06 AM
'SD is compulsory - there is no choice.'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D.A. is trying to be polite and not get a rocket here for going 'off topic'. 'fraid I've stopped caring about that!)
Going onto a business account gets rid of the neccessity of using S.D.
The comment he was replying to is a seller who really ought to be on a business account, but isn't....
This seller is selling golfing stuff :OK, benefit of the doubt, this all may be bits being passed on from his hobby. That's fair enough.
And he may well have a wife/daughter who buys, then changes her mind about lots of footwear and wants to sell those on (brand new) as well.....okay...... (though her feet do seem to be several different sizes?)
But it's very difficult to see how anybody can have loads and loads of brand new plumbing spares just 'hanging around the house' as personal possessions.
Because 'personal possessions' are what private selling accounts are for.....
(sellers like this one are going to be the ones that HMRC will be having closer looks at, once all the figures arrive, and the A.I. corrolates them to what's actually been sold.
Most of the worried, honest private sellers generally won't be looked at, because they're not selling loads of obvious, brand new, multiples of stuff)
25-09-2025 9:13 AM
25-09-2025 4:07 PM
25-09-2025 4:36 PM
Yet still a business, forcing people to pay a bpf and not accepting returns, you are breaking the law by misrepresentation too. It doesnt matter if you are a great business or a bad one you still shouldnt be breaking the law then complain about bad customer service from others.
25-09-2025 4:47 PM
25-09-2025 4:53 PM
You are forcing them to pay as you are on the incorrect account, you should be a business. You have already said you are just a bad business. Again returns should be on as youre a business. Its a joke that eBay allow people to get away with it but then for them to complain about bad customer service when they are breaking the law is laughable.
25-09-2025 4:56 PM