â02-01-2017 1:27 PM
â02-01-2017 1:30 PM
â02-01-2017 1:38 PM
It's probably not from a mammoth, it looks far too small.
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
â02-01-2017 1:43 PM
Your link doesn't work. Can't find anything specific on the search.
â02-01-2017 1:51 PM
Can't find anything either, got a link to what you've found CD?
â02-01-2017 2:16 PM
â02-01-2017 2:23 PM
â02-01-2017 2:43 PM
If that's from a mammoth I have a few questions.
Why is it so short?
Why is it so thin?
Who performed the circumcision?
â02-01-2017 2:44 PM
Police are Looking For A Mammoth In Distress
â02-01-2017 2:53 PM - edited â02-01-2017 2:58 PM
Try
metro.co.uk/2017/01/02/metal-detectorist-finds-fossil-on-beach-in-norfolk-6355984/
and always remember that i type very slowly
â02-01-2017 3:32 PM
Can't think why a mammoth was even suggested.
There were plenty of small mammals around at the time and they don't have the same kind of sheath as humans - some can retract the whole thing ..... maybe that would explain the ringed bit?
â02-01-2017 3:40 PM
Good to have a reply from someone with some sheath expertise.
Happy New Year btw.
â02-01-2017 3:53 PM
LOL
HNY to you too
â02-01-2017 3:56 PM
â02-01-2017 4:09 PM
Ah yes Buster Gonad, I remember it well.
â02-01-2017 4:18 PM
Was that the cartoon where the bloke was doing that and a terrified-looking woman was taking refuge up a tree?
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
â02-01-2017 4:21 PM
So you two were Viz readers?
Could be from a small primate perhaps, or my guess is that it could be part of a fossilised marine creature called an acorn worm
â02-01-2017 4:24 PM
Yes Buster Gonad the boy with the unfeasibly large testicles.
â02-01-2017 4:26 PM - edited â02-01-2017 4:27 PM
Clearly you've spent a long time studying such things first hand (so to speak), I bow to your superior knowledge.
â02-01-2017 4:35 PM