Even before the incident at the Olympics, to me he came across as a person with the attitude that the rules didn't apply to him and he would force changes where he could to suit him - and woe betide anyone who stuck to their guns.
After the incident, it must surely be clear that he is patently not safe to be allowed out.
The original verdict was quite shocking and even worse was his first attempt at parole from an obscenely short time inside, and then to find that he only served a bit more before being let out anyway.
I guess as he's on parole and his lawyers are appealing the decision, he's allowed to stay out on parole, but it must be heartbreaking and so distressing for Reeva's family.
@******lynda****** wrote:
I never understood the verdict in the first place. If you are living with someone and you wake up hearing sounds in the bathroom, would you not assume it is your partner? And only panic if you found them elsewhere?
When he woke up hearing noises, and he didn't find his partner in bed, then the first assumption would have been that the noises were her.
That is if one can really accept he had been asleep in the first place.
I think there was a terrible miscarriage of justice with this and I hope to goodness the second verdict stands and he is put back inside for a longer time and given proper monitoring to ensure he's no longer a threat to anyone.
********************************************************************************
My body is an old warehouse full of declining storage, my mind is a dusty old reference library, strictly for members and archaeologists only
70soghuBMoj(ld!L!~~_7.JPG "merehazle"){kind=avatar}
