01-04-2025 10:54 PM
Hi,
Reluctantly, I will be ending my listings by the end of the week, but will probably be dragged kicking and screaming into simple delivery. Having created my first simple delivery listing as a test, just a couple of questions. I have thankfully excluded Evri from my listing by using the 'postage preferences' in my account.
Looking at the postage options in the listing once live, available to the buyer are two options, standard tracked and express tracked delivery. It doesn't specify what these are. Other than select parcel size, I was at no point able to select a royal mail postage service like previously. Is it, hopefully due to the compensation level, RM Tracked 48 and Tracked 24 ? Please not second class signed for, lol.
With the international shipping, i have not opted for international postage in the postage options tab, but confusingly the 'excluded locations' tab further down the page is still showing and there are no excluded locations filled in. Furthermore, does anyone know if you can include international postage for some listings, and opt out for others ? Previously, it was either a blanket yes or no.
Thanks to anyone who takes the time to reply and feel free to ask any other questions in the thread if you want to. Simple delivery, unfortunately is here.
Thanks
neovass0
03-04-2025 8:07 PM
I have only ever used RM for sending and not had a problem. Since covid I discovered a parcel post box not far from my house, I print my own labels and my parcels are dropped in there, and I have never had a problem.
03-04-2025 8:10 PM - edited 03-04-2025 8:13 PM
You don't seem to have understood my earlier post.
@dch2112011 wrote:Yes that makes sense a postal receipt gives tracking reference as you described - that is a post office service and makes correct use of the service.
Once you use this service offered by the post office, they are responsible for the correct postal amount in that if RM check it and it is underweight /size then they will occur a penalty - RM pay the post office for these checks hence the penalty if it is wrong payments / charges. These are identified back to the post office branch by the receipt.
.
This is really designed for postage purchased and applied by the post office although it seems to be being used for online labels which according to the post office do not need checking, the free service offered is printing the label not applying it to a parcel.
I said that I buy and print my own RM labels from ebay. It's the same if I buy postage direct from RM online. They are scanned when posted at the PO. They need checking because I might not have weighed and measured my packages correctly. It's not just for postage bought at the PO. They appear to be treating SD labels the same way as other labels bought by people using the RM website.
With SD this service is unnecessary at the post office as it is not penalised if underweight / size,
It should be treated in the same way as account business post which also can be dropped at the post office, the post office get paid per sack or part of sack collected - they are not responsible for the weight / size -
Weights / Sizes are checked at the sorting machines and a charge is made to the business account holder - not the post office - so any charges are for ebay - ebay can pass on the charge plus some if the seller chose the service weight and size, or as part of the enhanced protection swallow the charges if ebay made the size and weight estimate.
The question is whether the receipt gives any added protection - the answer is probably not from what I can make of it - the label is a business postal service which offers no recompense from RM to a business account holder (special terms may have been negotiated by ebay - who knows ? )
Of course it gives protection (although I admit I've never had to use it). How would I prove I had posted a 1st or 2nd class item if I didn't have a receipt?
Under normal business terms ebay therefore pay for any lost or damaged items from the buyer protection fees by refunding the buyer (mbg) not deducting them from the seller proceeds.
If ebay calculate the wrong postal rate the seller does not pay the excess again funded from the buyer protection fees.
Have they discussed this with the Post Office or just with Royal Mail?
The ebay system generates the tracking number - a new label issued by the post office becomes an independant transaction cancelling the unused SD label and refunding the buyer so receipt or no receipt the seller pays the postage.
Why would a new label be issued by the PO?
The receipt could give a seperate tracking number to add to the ebay system - it allows you to add a second tracking number which supercedes the SD tracking number.
The ebay system will at the moment penalise the seller metrics because it will identify the first tracking number as not delivered on time before it is cancelled and the seller will get the cheery please make sure you post on time reminder - not a good part of the system but then it is designed as being able to add the second tracking number to protect a replacement sent for damaged or lost goods !
So what does a receipt give you for SD ? possibly a scan which will be accepted as proof of it entering the RM system - it would be interesting to see if this is immediate or whether the tracking is updated later in the day as it enters sorting - I am unsure of this.
If it's a fully tracked RM service, the tracking would be the same as any other fully tracked RM service. The scan at the PO (where they also check size and weight) is proof that it has entered the RM system.
But what it does do is changes the responsility for SD if the label is changed - effectively it cancels SD and the protections and leaves the seller paying for the postage
This is how I see it reading the published terms from the Post Office, ebay and Royal Mail - I haven't looked at EVRI
On balance it seems that not using the post office 'checking service' is the best course of action - if dropped off at the post office it is almost certainly going to enter the RM system but of course there is always a risk - it would all depend on whether a post office scan saying received at post office enhances the protection or is ignored.
What is the benefit of not scanning the label at the PO?
Certainly if the post office replace the label charging you it is not a good idea because the buyer will be refunded for the original SD label not you.
In reality SD is an agreement with RM and the tracking is activated once it starts it's journey at RM
This is where it differs from normal Business account postage - with a business account the tracking is added as soon as the label is generated automatically - this is accepted by ebay as in the RM system because business account holders are vetted and authorised to act as post offices including issuing their own postal receipts.
Under SD this happens but ebay seem to have added another layer where the tracking is only accepted when scanned by RM - so even though the tracking is uploaded automatically for enhanced protection ebay do not count this and start when the package is actually scanned by RM
The proof that a package has entered the RM system is when the item is scanned at the PO or by the postie if you request a collection. Not when the label is generated. This is the same as when buying postage direct from RM. The error that ebay and/or RM seem to have made is to encode the size and weight into the QR code. If the size and weight were the maximum that can be sent using SD, then packages wouldn't fail the check at the PO. At the moment the PO is treating SD packages in the same way as those with labels bought from the RM website.
03-04-2025 8:16 PM
You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?
If you hand the item to a post office employee for scanning, the POA you receive doesn't give you a different tracking number. It will show the number on the attached label.
We all know that the PO/RM's systems are not perfect. We often read on here about items never scanned at any point in their journey. To eBay, the tracking of such packages looks exactly the same as it would, if the seller had never sent them (which will often be the case). Receiving a POA is the ONLY way a sender can prove that an item has been entered into the Royal Mail network. (I admit, it's not 100% necessary, but without it, you're going to lose any INR claims.)
With Simple Delivery, there is a commitment from eBay that they will meet the cost of INRs. Obviously, they aren't going to do this willy-nilly. They will only fund this if it is proven that the item entered the Royal Mail network.
Your final paragraph almost makes sense, but you're looking at it backwards. Getting a POA is a way of ensuring that the package is recorded as entering the RM network. The intricacies of eBay/PO/RM's agreement don't come into this at all.
03-04-2025 8:47 PM - edited 03-04-2025 8:48 PM
@vinylscot wrote:Receiving a POA is the ONLY way a sender can prove that an item has been entered into the Royal Mail network. (I admit, it's not 100% necessary, but without it, you're going to lose any INR claims.)
No, once an item receives its first scan it is deemed to have entered the network so a POA isn't necessary to prove this. Once the item has entered the network any INR is then the responsibility of eBay as they are the deemed sender.
A POA would only be of any potential use in the event that the item doesn't receive that first scan for some reason. Thereafter the POA would be redundant.
03-04-2025 9:04 PM
@sml192 wrote:
@vinylscot wrote:Receiving a POA is the ONLY way a sender can prove that an item has been entered into the Royal Mail network. (I admit, it's not 100% necessary, but without it, you're going to lose any INR claims.)
No, once an item receives its first scan it is deemed to have entered the network so a POA isn't necessary to prove this. Once the item has entered the network any INR is then the responsibility of eBay as they are the deemed sender.
Personally I always take / keep a paper receipt, because technology is not perfect and maybe something goes wrong with the scan, it looks like it scans but it doesn't show up on the system - without the receipt you wouldn't be able to prove that you'd dropped it off.
03-04-2025 9:45 PM
@sml192 wrote:
@vinylscot wrote:Receiving a POA is the ONLY way a sender can prove that an item has been entered into the Royal Mail network. (I admit, it's not 100% necessary, but without it, you're going to lose any INR claims.)
No, once an item receives its first scan it is deemed to have entered the network so a POA isn't necessary to prove this. Once the item has entered the network any INR is then the responsibility of eBay as they are the deemed sender.
A POA would only be of any potential use in the event that the item doesn't receive that first scan for some reason. Thereafter the POA would be redundant.
The first scan is the one done at the Post Office when they give you the receipt with the tracking number, so you only get the receipt if the item is scanned. Royal Mail want to see the PO proof of posting in order to make a claim (this is for postage bought online from RM, not SD).
With SD, I would still want some sort of proof that I had posted the item - either a paper receipt or an email or other verification. If it got lost and there was no proof that I had actually posted it, how could I (or ebay) make a claim from RM? They could just claim that they never received it.
What is POA?
03-04-2025 9:57 PM
When ebay say they handle any disputes with buyers so sellers don't have to ,do sellers lose their money from the sale ,ebay say they will deal with items lost or broken who takes the hit . If we are having to use ebays labels they should take the hit as sellers don't want the SD .
03-04-2025 10:16 PM
'When ebay say they handle any disputes with buyers so sellers don't have to ,do sellers lose their money from the sale ,ebay say they will deal with items lost or broken who takes the hit?.....'
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a seller uses Simple Delivery, ebay say they will be responsible for item lost or damaged in the post, *not* the seller. Provided the items conform to ebay's terms and the carrier's terms.
This leaves us with the 'exclusion list' problem, which, I have just found out (thank you @edwardian-dreams ) is apparently going to be solved by ebay, but we don't know how that works yet. We shall have to wait and see....
Loss in the post should be fairly clearly covered by ebay, but I can foresee a bit of bother occuring when it comes to damages. As the actual packaging of the item is roughly the only thing left to the seller's responsibility, I'm not sure how this is going to work.
As in, will ebay use the 'inadequate packaging' defence currently used by delivery companies?
03-04-2025 10:31 PM
vinted compensate for excluded items but they require photos or video of packaging at every stage
maybe eBay will go this way
as you say so much we don’t know and will have wait and see and we should do bEFORE they launched the flipping new system
but it seems like they make it up as they go along from what I’ve seen in the last week or so
today I read that an agent told someone …oh the prices on SD are higher than they should be but we’re going to fix this before the 15th
sigh
03-04-2025 11:20 PM
@vinylscot wrote:You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?
Seemingly a lot more than you give me credit for - if you actually read what was written you would not make such statements
If you hand the item to a post office employee for scanning, the POA you receive doesn't give you a different tracking number. It will show the number on the attached label.
This is exactly what I stated several times - the bit you jumped on but failed to read and digest was that if the SD package was overweight or oversize and you purchased a different label - the reference number/ tracking number would be different and you would therefore have chosen to enter into a contract with the post office and the SD Contract would be cancelled, the unused SD label would be refunded to the buyer, you as a seller would lose the enhanced protection, have to pay for the postage, have to manually add the different tracking number and would suffer a hit on your metrics - it's really straight forward when you read the information published by ebay, the post office and Royal Mail - you don't have to make it up !
We all know that the PO/RM's systems are not perfect. We often read on here about items never scanned at any point in their journey. To eBay, the tracking of such packages looks exactly the same as it would, if the seller had never sent them (which will often be the case). Receiving a POA is the ONLY way a sender can prove that an item has been entered into the Royal Mail network. (I admit, it's not 100% necessary, but without it, you're going to lose any INR claims.)
With Simple Delivery, there is a commitment from eBay that they will meet the cost of INRs. Obviously, they aren't going to do this willy-nilly. They will only fund this if it is proven that the item entered the Royal Mail network.
It looks like you are basing this opinion on sales outside of Simple Delivery, where a postal receipt service by the post office allows the Royal Mail tracking system to partially or fully track a label for various non business account services
With Simple Delivery which is clearly a business account service - the tracking is loaded automatically when the label is generated by a link from RM to ebay - ebay as an authorised account holder are treated as a business account holder and this upload of tracking from the carrier is accepted outside of Simple Delivery that the package has entered the postal system - the difference is the enhanced protection which you only get with Simple Delivery !
With Simple Delivery the enhanced protection starts when it is scanned as received by RM and finishes when it is scanned delivered which indicates that ebay may have added another layer for their own protection which could be when RM scan into their system at sorting.
The question is what extra protection does a postal receipt give you in terms of simple delivery - NOT how a postal receipt works for deliveries made outside of simple delivery
Your final paragraph almost makes sense, but you're looking at it backwards. Getting a POA is a way of ensuring that the package is recorded as entering the RM network. The intricacies of eBay/PO/RM's agreement don't come into this at all.
Of course how the system works is of importance
If the package is already recorded as entering the RM system by RM adding the tracking number when the label is generated because EBAY the business account holder is licenced as part of the RM system - HOW is adding a postal receipt going to make any difference - it endorses the same information ?-
I appreciate you may not understand how business account post is handled or the responsibilities given to a business account holder but it does seem that with SD ebay have added another layer before the enhanced protection cuts in -
The problem members seem to be complaining about is that when they use the post office receipt system and package weights / sizes are wrong the post office will not accept them without the seller buying a seperate label which cancels the SD label because it remains unused and an unused SD label is refunded to the buyer !
If an additional cost is taken by the post office the receipt I guess shows a different tracking number for this label which may be the one scanned - not sure that helps get payment easily ?
When pointing out that the post office themselves state that they will print a label, hand it to the seller and then accept the parcel for delivery which solves the problem it is met with excuses about Royal Mail and the Post office being wholly unreliable and that the only way to get paid by ebay is to get a postal receipt !
I am not sure this is good advice or even that ebay accept the postal receipt for enhanced protection within Simple Delivery using business acount post or even whether the added ebay layer exists or kicks in at a higher level in RM's system
04-04-2025 8:41 AM
Whoever is right or wrong about the details I'm amazed that anyone would post anything within a system that's so ambiguous.
I know the clarity of ebay announcements has never been good, but ATM it seems that sending anything under SD is effectively "at your own risk"? If your item is lost or damaged someone might refund or compensate or they might not.
All the details of the sellers and ebays rights and obligations under SD should be in place for sellers to read. Isn't that what a contract is all about? Without those details is a contract even valid? It looks to me like sellers are being compelled to use a service based on everything going well, with the caveat that if it goes wrong, we'll tell you the rest of the details when it's already too late to do anything about it.
04-04-2025 9:19 AM
You're missing the whole point.
We know what should happen, and, if that does happen, then you are correct.
Getting a POA is to cover the seller is those cases where a package does not receive any scans from inside the RM network. Anyone who has been reading these board for a few months will know that this does happen. Items should be scanned multiple times, but if they are "lost" somewhere near the beginning of the process, they are often never scanned at all.
If you don't have a POA, and your item does not get scanned, how do you expect eBay to believe you actually sent the item, when the buyer claims INR?
04-04-2025 9:22 AM
Your argument only holds water IF PO/RM do their job properly.
Sadly, as many of us have experienced, often they do not.
It is therefore prudent to get as much evidence as you can. It is folly to state otherwise.
I don't intend to respond to any more of your, frankly unhinged, nonsense regarding this point.
04-04-2025 9:39 AM
@theelench wrote:Whoever is right or wrong about the details I'm amazed that anyone would post anything within a system that's so ambiguous.
I know the clarity of ebay announcements has never been good, but ATM it seems that sending anything under SD is effectively "at your own risk"? If your item is lost or damaged someone might refund or compensate or they might not.
All the details of the sellers and ebays rights and obligations under SD should be in place for sellers to read. Isn't that what a contract is all about? Without those details is a contract even valid? It looks to me like sellers are being compelled to use a service based on everything going well, with the caveat that if it goes wrong, we'll tell you the rest of the details when it's already too late to do anything about it.
The SD terms and conditions are here.
Terms & Conditions | eBay.co.uk
This is what they say about liability.
You remain responsible for any loss or damage to your item until it has been scanned into the carrier’s network. Once your item has been scanned into the carrier’s network and providing you used the Simple Delivery label and are compliant with these Terms and eBay’s Policies, as well as the relevant Carrier Terms, your item will be covered for loss or damage during transit up to the sold item value on the eBay.co.uk site. This means you will retain your sales proceeds in relation to the item sent using the Simple Delivery label. The item will be in transit from the point it has been scanned into the carrier’s network until it has been marked as delivered by the carrier.
According to this, as long as you get the SD label scanned at the post office when you send it then you are covered.
04-04-2025 9:43 AM
I've sent plenty of items where they are scanned at Post Office but never show on line as entering the network. Of course you need a proof of posting receipt, it's the only evidence you have that the item has been accepted by the Post Office.
04-04-2025 9:49 AM - edited 04-04-2025 9:59 AM
Well Ebay have a lot of kop outs so they do not have to pay compensation......one being that the item must be packed properly. Interesting to see who decides on whether it was or not if an item gets damaged. I did see something on ebay telling us exactly how to pack items and what to use to pack them...including foam chips (Ebay bleeped out the correct word lol) etc. What happened to sellers including packaging costs in their P & P am i correct in thinking we are expected to pay for the packaging ourselves now? I guess those may have to be added to the BIN or auction price? As experienced as i am i am still slightly confused by this simple delivery 😞
Another thing i am interested in............are Ebay actually aware of how long Evris exclusion from compensation list actually is as it covers so much. I will sit back and see if Ebay are including items on Evris non compensation list or send at your own risk under this daft Simple Delivery.
Sorry but i totally disagree with your last sentence as there are so many ways for one not to be covered 😞
04-04-2025 10:01 AM
I agree that there are plenty of reasons why you might not be covered. I was just responding to someone who said that the terms and conditions should be made clear and directing them to what ebay says. What I said is not my opinion, it's just quoting ebay. They say "providing you used the Simple Delivery label and are compliant with these Terms and eBay’s Policies, as well as the relevant Carrier Terms, your item will be covered for loss or damage during transit up to the sold item value on the eBay.co.uk site"
So you need to read the T&C for RM and Evri as well as the ebay T&C to ensure you're covered. Which makes so-called 'Simple Delivery' more complicated that what I do at the moment, which is just check that I'm covered under RM T&C.
04-04-2025 10:06 AM
I only ever use RM so know exactly whether i am covered or not 🙂 Yep i am one of those that generally read all the legal terms and conditions on any documentation but saying that many folk do not.
Simple delivery will never ever work for us unfortunately 😞 Such a shame but thats the reality.
04-04-2025 10:08 AM
"According to this, as long as you get the SD label scanned at the post office when you send it then you are covered.
Whether using SD, RM or exempt ebay labels the item is not scanned into RM networks at the Post Office. The networks are not linked. That is why you need POP.
As far as I am aware all the other carriers I have used are logged into the network at the shop you drop it off at and you get a receipt and a text to say so.
04-04-2025 10:14 AM - edited 04-04-2025 10:15 AM
That first sentence means nothing due to all the other conditions before that is effective
I think that only applies to lost items