01-10-2024 1:34 PM - edited 01-10-2024 1:44 PM
From the sky news article here which is obviously a press release https://news.sky.com/story/ebay-selling-fees-are-scrapped-to-boost-to-reselling-13225638
It seems clear ebay is following in the footsteps of other selling marketplaces by adding fees for buyers in the early new year, but since fees remain in place for business sellers adding another fee on top of this is another hit to our bottom line.
We will now be expected to absorb the buyers fee and our own business selling fee (and shop fees etc).
This seems crazy to me - although eBay say it'll be 'small' , if it's 8% like elsewhere that's a massive hit for us to take. Yes it's for the buyers but we all know prices will drop because of it - for example a 350 item will now cost 379 to the buyer with an 8% fee that is currently used by another platform, so ofc sellers will drop the initial price so that the item actually sells and to offset this.
Fine for private sellers who have no fees to compensate, but insane for business sellers with hefty fvf and shop fees already
Solved! Go to Solution.
24-02-2025 3:20 AM
@amazonharvey wrote:
Because the fee is added to the private sellers items before it is uploaded
on to eBay .then there is no nasty shocks at check out .Read the letter
that was sent out to every seller informing this would happen . That’s
pulling the wool over buyers faces if they do not know about the 4% being
added .
Exactly! There should be on the listing page the price at which a private seller has listed an item for and directly underneath there should be 'eBay buyer protection fee £x' - you can't get clearer than that!
So based upon the mumbo jumbo of strange looking prices on private sellers listings, I would call the additional 'hidden' added fee - deceit.
The extra fee, in my personal experience, does not include a 24 hour help / live chat, which is the only difference for the extra money eBay are 'adding on' . I've tried all week, including today at 3.11am, to have a live chat with an agent being told by the lovely BOT that opening times are: 8am - 10pm - So what exactly is the extra 'protection fee' for which isn't already covered in the MBG? 🤔😲
As I've already said, online shoppers are very savvy, no matter how well eBay think they've hidden the extra fee. I'll give eBay a real example: A potential buyer asked if I would accept £x for an unwanted item I have listed on my private sellers eBay account. I said yes, and changed the price accordingly. However, they messaged and said I don't see £x I see £1.08 more, so I sent them a screen shot of what I had set the item price at and what eBay are charging them on top - silence. Did they go and buy from an eBay business seller? No, without any prompting, they went to another site and purchased my item for the price they asked for 😉.
That single potential customer has now been left with the impression that eBay are 'turning them over' on all listings, regardless of account type, and I certainly wasn't going to clarify the situation for them because it should already be clear to them on listings, which it isn't - OUCH! 😫
News travels F-A-S-T, and in eBay's case, it isn't good..... Enjoy!
24-02-2025 6:42 AM
There's been a flood of double scam 'protection' racket listings this weekend.
For the first time in over 20 years I've not bought anything for more than 3 days. Hopefully eBay figure that into their sums.
Also, the scam double 'protection' racket makes the BIN item very oddly priced so it's immediately obvious which item has been contaminated.
I did spend money on Amazon and I'm going to start looking elsewhere for used goods.
24-02-2025 6:46 AM
A £2.99 item has now gone up to £3.83 0.99 is now £1.75 that's higher fees than before so it will be no longer worth selling cheap items if buyers wont pay it
24-02-2025 6:55 AM
Sadly amazon fees are extortionate for selling secondhand plus many sellers need amazon's approval to sell many items
24-02-2025 8:00 AM
You're right, news travel F-A-S-T. Instantly if using the internet.
Last night I was one of 72 people in a particular group that was bulk-emailed by someone in the group about "warning ebay buyer protection tax" ("tax", not fee). It's stirring up discussion. I already knew about BPF, must admit hadn't myself thought to email the group.
24-02-2025 2:11 PM
01-03-2025 9:46 PM
I'd say you are wrong on that
01-03-2025 10:07 PM
02-03-2025 1:19 PM
As a buyer you would pay the seller whatever fee they chose to charge - even inflated at the seller's whim
or the seller would offer free delivery hiding the price in the item price - the buyer still pays whatever unknown figure the seller adds to the sale price even if it is inflated.
With simple delivery the buyer pays the delivery fee at a fixed price to ebay on behalf of the seller (so that the seller retains liability for delivering the goods)
Why would a buyer not like this system ? It delivers better service than sellers offer by standardising the delivery charge and stopping sellers charging and declaring a high end service but deliberately using a cheaper untracked service and pocketing the difference - Oh yes this happens a lot and is a major complaint for buyers !
It stops sellers using untracked services which are basically untraceable which do not show when the item enters the delivery service - so sellers can be very slow at posting blaming the postal service or not post at all and stall the buyer with loads of blame excuses of the postal service and hope that they keep the payday loan paid by the buyer or at least hope that they keep it until an INR is resolved - Oh yes this also happens a lot and is another major complaint buyers make !
ebay have solved these problems and you believe buyers will not like it !
02-03-2025 2:32 PM
02-03-2025 2:57 PM
Strangely I have seen many many buyers complain about sellers using a different postal service than the one the seller advertised but never a seller admitting they have used the cheaper service for their own gain.
Strangely I have seen many many buyers complaining about non delivery, very late posting only for sellers to whine that they can only get to town on a friday or they wait a couple of weeks until they have sold more items 'to make it worthwhile' - ludicrous excuses - without tracking the sellers whine that it is up to the carrier - they claim to have posted it - beg the buyer to wait longer (in the hope that they run out of time to claim an INR case )- some fall for it ! little wonder ebay are taking the lead with delivery !
Strangely I have seen many many posts from buyers when asking the seller where the purchased item is after several days without tracking to receive abuse and indignance,with the seller claiming it is the carrier or even the buyers fault or ebays fault and they should be grateful they sold it to them - little wonder ebay have decided to hold the sellers money until it is delivered - if they cannot be trusted to complete a sale in a timely and polite fashion.
Strangely I have seen many posts of sellers ignoring buyers communications or claiming falsely that the item has been delivered with false tracking numbers, false promises of delivery or false claims of reissuing the order - it is little wonder that ebay are holding funds as an incentive for sellers to actually deliver what is sold - is it too much to ask a seller to deliver an order ?
As for buyers falsely claiming INR's - with ebay forcing tracking and holding sellers money - it incentivises sellers to dispatch quickly and label correctly tracked to get paid quickly and this will virtually eliminate false INR claims - Win Win Win !
02-03-2025 3:29 PM
02-03-2025 5:23 PM
'With simple delivery the buyer pays the delivery fee at a fixed price to ebay on behalf of the seller (so that the seller retains liability for delivering the goods) '
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With Simple Delivery, I was under the impression that ebay now have the responsibility/liability for delivery the goods?
They have stated 'once the parcel is placed into the hands of the delivery company , non-delivery and damages in the post become ebay's responsibility' (or words to that effect).
02-03-2025 5:58 PM
Taken from the new user agreement - highlighted are the relevant words which spell out the purchase of labels by the buyer is on behalf of the seller
Simple Delivery
We may add certain delivery options to your listings in order to help improve both seller and buyer experience for selecting a delivery label. For listings that are eligible, you may see a simplified listing flow where you are not required to select a delivery option. In such instances, your buyer may be able to choose whether to have a standard or express delivery service or whether to collect in store and will pay the delivery costs to the delivery service provider on your behalf. Once your item has sold and the buyer has paid, a delivery label will be provided to you.
02-03-2025 6:03 PM
02-03-2025 6:07 PM
02-03-2025 6:39 PM - edited 02-03-2025 6:46 PM
Under simple delivery the customer's doll has added seller and buyer protection - ebay cover the cost of the damage or loss and the seller is not penalised ie they still get paid. So really not an issue - ebay will soon sort out the carriers if it costs them too much - I guess as a carrot for the business the carriers have agreed some sort of recompense or the buyers fee covers it ? They have plenty of data available to accurately predict losses
Protection
Your item is fully covered against loss or damage during transit from the moment it's scanned by the carrier until delivery confirmation.
From the simple delivery terms and conditions
12. Liability for Loss or Damage and Compensation.
You remain responsible for any loss or damage to your item until it has been scanned into the carrier’s network. Once your item has been scanned into the carrier’s network and providing you used the Simple Delivery label and are compliant with these Terms and eBay’s Policies, as well as the relevant Carrier Terms, your item will be covered for loss or damage during transit up to the sold item value on the eBay.co.uk site. This means you will retain your sales proceeds in relation to the item sent using the Simple Delivery label. The item will be in transit from the point it has been scanned into the carrier’s network until it has been marked as delivered by the carrier.
Of course you lose the cover once the buyer has received it according to the wording - which needs clarifying for items received damaged ?
02-03-2025 6:49 PM
Isn’t this “protection insurance” just the same as PPI it’s an insurance e that you cannot opt out of!
this just pushes out private sellers selling goods for cheap ie a £1.00 item now costs £1.79!
the mandatory insurance protection should only be imposed on purchases over £20, anything else is covered under a normal Royal Mail signed for service.
lets face it who wants insurance for anything they have bought for less than £20
02-03-2025 7:01 PM
02-03-2025 7:25 PM - edited 02-03-2025 7:28 PM
Unfortunately it is just one of the problems for private sellers because of ebay's greed: