30-06-2014 9:02 PM
Could ebay please remove all the listings selling art work etc done by the convicted pedofile.
03-07-2014 2:18 PM
@cee-dee wrote:So, you've read the references at the bottom of the page or did you just skip over the first hundred words and dismiss it all as "fairly useless"?
Thanks CD........Some good reading here and some good links.. Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extends the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[1][2][3][4] A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years of age, but adolescents who are 16 years of age or older must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.[1][2]
03-07-2014 2:57 PM
04-07-2014 1:25 PM
Well he got 5years and 9 months
04-07-2014 1:56 PM
I thought it would be more,,,do you think he will serve the full 5years and nine months?,,, i should jolly well hope so!!
04-07-2014 2:11 PM
@rose2008-2008 wrote:I thought it would be more,,,do you think he will serve the full 5years and nine months?,,, i should jolly well hope so!!
No he may do 2 years..But other people are coming forward ..there could be another court case in the future.
05-07-2014 1:30 PM
I have the good feeling it may be lengthened definately as more are coming forward. Did not Stuart halls get lengthened?. Im not sure. It should be at least 10, and serve 10!!!!!!!!!!!. No remorse whatsoever shockingly,, that to me shows a sick mind!!!!. I wonder if he even apologized to his wife and daughter?. SICK!!!!!!!!!!!.
09-07-2014 3:18 PM
10-07-2014 12:01 PM
Yes i wonder if the Queen had her picture,,,,what she has done with it????. That would be interesting to know.
10-07-2014 12:18 PM
Leaving aside what RH has been convicted of and reading the criticisms of the Art as drawn and painted by him, I think that the same critical look should be taken at "Art" by Van Gogh, Picasso and even some of the "Impressionist" painters. Would Jones dare to level the same criticism at them if he applied his same criteria?
Really, what IS "Art"? That mess created by Tracey Emin isn't Art.
The daubs by Van Gogh are in the same category (or even several pegs below!) the art displayed on the walls of Nurseries and Primary schools. Some of the work by RH at least looks like what it's supposed to be.
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
10-07-2014 12:54 PM
10-07-2014 2:05 PM
Surely you can find paintings of similar ilk to these on the walls of Primary schools?
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
10-07-2014 2:19 PM
10-07-2014 3:08 PM
10-07-2014 3:27 PM
10-07-2014 3:29 PM
10-07-2014 3:48 PM
10-07-2014 3:48 PM
I once saw a progamme on the Royal Academy's Summer Exibition.
One part was where the selectors were judging submissions, they were sitting in a large room with staff carrying the pictures in from one side, most of the pictures were judged so quickly the staff member didn't stop walking, just went straight out the other side.
I knew someone who was always peeved none of his stuff was ever selected.
10-07-2014 4:03 PM
10-07-2014 4:28 PM
I quite like this but I'd better not post the full pic:-
http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/2624/delapoerdowning18851902.jpg
Perhaps I like it because it's because it's hanging on my wall?
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
10-07-2014 5:34 PM