Leaving aside what RH has been convicted of and reading the criticisms of the Art as drawn and painted by him, I think that the same critical look should be taken at "Art" by Van Gogh, Picasso and even some of the "Impressionist" painters. Would Jones dare to level the same criticism at them if he applied his same criteria?

Really, what IS "Art"? That mess created by Tracey Emin isn't Art.

The daubs by Van Gogh are in the same category (or even several pegs below!) the art displayed on the walls of Nurseries and Primary schools. Some of the work by RH at least looks like what it's supposed to be.