JFK .... 50 years on.

[blackburn_stevie]

Previously unseen footage  of the shooting has been released using the 50 year rule.

Claims are being made that the headwound was caused by a shot from the driver of the presidential limo.

Here's a link to the video.

http://tinyurl.com/o5pzx7l

What do you think?

[cee-dee]

He felt like it and took the opportunity before him.

If you research the things Ruby did that day you'll see that it was a "spur-of-the-moment" thing, not a planned action.

One thing the thread's shown up so far is that even after 50 years, people are still not aware of things which are undisputed and are still lost in the the misinformation of the early days.

[chef-one-collectables]

A rich man from a super rich and powerful family gets shot doing a job his privilege brought him. From a family of with members of dubious character. Years later people still spend hours talking about it. A child dies alone of malnutrition and not one word is ever spoken of them. I know which one matters most to me.

[saasher2012]

Well Said! & that is Factl!!

[Anonymous]

Hi folks, apologies for intruding . . . . . . but I don't think that anyone's mentioned this new publication/presentation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65N3eP2yvbQ

I don't get into discussions about JFK any more, but after watching the Counter Intelligence documentatries - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmyzHuxgY2E - nothing would surprise me!

[cee-dee]

Five, that first video contains stuff that doesn't match the forensics. Files "testimony" is rubbish.

[saasher2012]

I'm sorry to contradict you,but once again you have a person who is after his 15 min of fame, check out his body language? I also whilst looking at this so called testimony, was able to check the PM piece that was also there, Sorry there is no way he took a side shot. Indeed if he had, & I'm being brutal here.Husband & wife would be dead .

[cee-dee]

50 years ago, it was hard to get hold of a lot of info. Today, it's much easier but sadly there's still those who only adopt the same attitude as the 60's = latch on to some bit of misinformation and take it as fact then spread it as widely as possible.

[saasher2012]

I am sorry for any confusion given in my contradiction posting ,my reply was to 5left not to CD! Once again., sorry 5left& sorry CD!!

[cee-dee]

Hey Sam, how about performing a remote PM on JFK based on available info?

It might not come amiss to give a pathological explanation of how a bullet entering a skull at high velocity can "disrupt" the "contents" so much that in the split seconds before the bullet exits, some of the "contents" are expelled through the entry hole?

[Anonymous]

Hi guys - I really don't have a point of view to contradict on this . . . . . . I've watched Files' interview tapes and I couldn't help thinking that his memory was unrealistically clear . . .

But then I know enough about cointelpro to reserve judgement on what I'm told to believe . . .

So, as I said, I don't bother getting into discussions about JFK these days . . .

[saasher2012]

In case of confusion I am replying to CD, due to the very graphic & sensitive nature of a PM. I feel it would not be in any bodies interest for me to comply with this request , however if anyone does have an interest in this field of Forensic pathology you can follow 5s link to I tube, & you will find a conspiracy Autopsy on JFK. Make your own mind up?. I look forward to your opinions. Sam

[cee-dee]

People who still think there was a shooter on the Grassy Knoll should watch this slo-mo and see the ejecta from the entry hole (on the right):-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-mzoqvZ118

A skull, even though it's much harder than that type of pumpkin behaves in the same way.

[blackburn_stevie]

Nobody seems to be mentioning the report about JFK being shot accidentally by the Secret Service bloke in the second car as he tried to line up his M-15 carbine on a window in the book depository.
On the other hand, LHO MUST be guilty 'cos the Secret Service collected and then lost all of the photos taken at the autopsy.

[cee-dee]

As LHO's shooting ability has been called in to question, a little known fact is that he purchased the Carcarno and had it fitted with a scope, then he went to a shooting range and got a bloke there to zero the scope for him.

After doing that, the chap who zero'd the scope asked LHO to try it and he fired three shots scoring a bullseye at 100 yards with all three.

LHO was at the shooting range at least twice more after that so he'd had some practice with the gun before shooting JFK. The range from the book depository window to the position JFK was in at the head-shot was 265 FEET!

At that range and resting on the windowsill, I think even I could have made that shot with an ordinary .22 using only long rifle HV cartridges. It would have been much easier with the 6.5 m/m rifle and the ammo LHO used which had a greater powder charge. (That is, much greater than the charge in a .22 HVLR)

[renomarvinm]

I remember fifty years ago hearing the original news.   I was taking a journalism class at a junior college in Pasadena, California, and the staff was notorious for playing practical jokes, some of which were rather sick.    I was walking down the hallway to class, when somebody yelled that "JFK has been shot," and all I could think was that this was even worse than their normal humor - then I heard the radio broadsast, and it sunk in.

After Ruby shot Oswald in the Dallas Police Station, a joke went all over Los Angeles.  It went like this:  

QUESTION:  What did the Dallas Police say when an elephant walked into the Dallas Police Station?

ANSWER:  Nothing.  Nobody saw it.

JFK knew very well that Dallas was the capitol of Redneck Central, and that the wackos were armed to the teeth.  He was flaunting it all when he rode in that parade.  Please understand - I am not opposed to his viewpoints, but I wish he had used better judgement.

[saasher2012]

In reply to renomarvinm, very good point! Also am I correct in saying he also asked for the protection bubble to be removed from the car?

[**caution**opinion_ahead]

He did.

[cee-dee]

WARNING. Don't watch this if you're liable to be upset:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q91RZko5Gw

The video shows the shooting from the famous Zapruder film digitally enhanced and in slow motion. There are several different sequences with differing degrees of enhancement. As the film had no soundtrack, while the shots are being displayed, there is no commentary so don't think your sound has failed.

[saasher2012]

In reply to caution, thanks for conformation.

[mepixin12]

Have never seen this picture before...? What do you guys make of it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu0azrNG9go