18-07-2013 2:43 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-23352162
This could be a sad loss to the world of theatre but to say the guy was a "star" may be overstating it a tad.
To me, the STAR of a film is the man or woman that gets a notation at the very top of the listing just after the actual name of the film itself. Anyone else involved is just occupying a supporting role.
Any input from the film buffs amongst you?
18-07-2013 4:47 PM
@stevie_blunder** wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-23352162
This could be a sad loss to the world of theatre but to say the guy was a "star" may be overstating it a tad.
To me, the STAR of a film is the man or woman that gets a notation at the very top of the listing just after the actual name of the film itself. Anyone else involved is just occupying a supporting role.
Any input from the film buffs amongst you?
You are right.
To say the guy was a STAR would be overstating it.
I suppose that is why noone has said it!!!
Nowhere in the article does it mention he was A STAR.
21-07-2013 8:49 AM
Perhaps he meant to post this .....
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/missing-bond-movie-star-paul-587759
21-07-2013 9:23 AM
@mr-expresso wrote:Perhaps he meant to post this .....
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/missing-bond-movie-star-paul-587759
Just put dots in before sig.
21-07-2013 9:33 AM
@tommy.irene wrote:
@mr-expresso wrote:
No point in having a sig now because it looks as though it is part of the post... Just put dots in before sig..
21-07-2013 10:43 AM
Hi Tommy.....
But if I did that then I would have to change my sig... Because it wouldn't then look like part of the post...