20-11-2013 2:58 PM
.......this is the standard of our education system.
Feedback left for an Ebay seller ........
" I paided and I didn't receive the item and steel waiting for move than 15 days "
20-11-2013 3:57 PM
20-11-2013 4:01 PM
If you've transcribed that feedback message accurately, the following suspicious points occur:
1, "I paided" doesn't seem a credible error. "I payed" would be.
2. Note the accurate and correct use of the apostrophe in "didn't".
3. Note the correct spelling of "receive".
So could the feedback be a wind-up?
20-11-2013 4:22 PM
"steel" and "move" are actual words, so could be a case of predictive text auto-correcting typos and the buyer didn't check before submitting.
20-11-2013 5:45 PM
20-11-2013 6:58 PM
"paided" may be just a missing space if the seller was called Ed
23-11-2013 6:15 PM
Well at least if he won the item he must have bidded well !!
23-11-2013 11:40 PM
I hope the person in question was confrontated about this.
25-11-2013 9:42 AM
You could send him one of these for Christmas...
25-11-2013 5:21 PM
Well, I would actually encourage the use of "bidded". It's an example of progress in the English language.
A progress towards increased clarity, and disambiguation. Current British usage of the verb "bid" is sullied by an ambiguity. The Present Tense "I bid " (now, today), isn't distinguished from the Past Tense "I bid" ( yesterday).
Of course, one might say this isn't a serious problem. We can usually guess which tense is meant, by the context in which the verb is used. Nevertheless, a clear verbal distinction would be better, as it does away with the need to guess.
Hence I think the distinction "I bid - I bidded" is a valuable advance towards clarity.
If anyone isn't convinced, consider the case of another short verb - "to fit". In British English, we clearly distinguish the Past Tense, by using "fitted".
But our American friends lamentably have yet to make this distinction. In American English, you'll see statements like:
"I bought a new dress last week - it fit perfectly!" To our advanced British eyes, doesn't that look gratingly wrong?
As wrong, I suggest, as "I bid yesterday" will soon seem. So let's welcome " I bidded" !
26-11-2013 9:31 PM
It's difficult to think of a use of the verb to bid in the present tense where its use would be ambiguous.
In most cases bid in the present tense would have to be a verbal use of the verb for as soon as you use it in its written form it is in the past tense.
29-11-2013 11:26 AM
Yes, when you say "verbal use of the verb", you're referring to the Present Continuous., which incorporates a participle. As in "I am bidding". And you're right that this clearly marks the tense as not Past. (Though it could be Future. As in : "I'm bidding on that item tomorrow.")
Even so, I think that the distinction between "I bid - I bidded" is good, and marks progress towards the regularisation of our language.
For example, consider these two putative statements, made by a hypothetical contestant in a sports event:-
1. I ran the race, threw a javelin, put the shot, leapt over the high-jump, fought in the judo, and swam in the pool.
2.. I runned in the race, throwed a javelin, putted the shot, leaped over the high-jump, fighted in the judo, and swimmed in the pool.
Which has more emotional punch, and lingering afterthoughts?