7ryMJjyBMgowKMZdQ~~_7.JPG "cee-dee"){kind=avatar}
Sorry, Saasher - but are you and I living on the same planet? You think it's acceptable that he may have lied and then it's okay for the jury to have found him "not guilty" because they are too stupid to make up their own minds? You think he's lied and it's okay, because he might get away with it. Really?????
Cee-Dee - you are putting forward your hypothetical scenario of a car crime on an equal level, which it is not. There cannot always be any physical evidence of an assault - an unwanted "grope" doesn't leave evidence, also there may not always be witnessess (calculated by the perpetrator).
And in my real life, I (and colleagues) DID complain, but naturally, nothing was done, it was simply dismissed as "harmless fun". In those days, it was seen as "the norm".
Cee-Dee - I put it behind me (it wasn't nearly as serious as some of these claims, as I've mentioned in the WR thread), and two of the old guys are most probably dead now, hopefully (actually, I know for sure one of them is). Mine were isolated incidents and I got out of them unscathed. That is not the point - the point is, worse things happened to other people, they weren't believed, now they may be. The point is, these women are brave enough to come forward now, having been afraid to speak out before, and now are still not being believed. I'm just trying to get you to understand that things like this happened but people like you refuse to believe it. You all just think that because they are well-known names, they couldn't possibly be guilty. Well of course, they could - possibly. Not saying they are, but just ..... possibly
I understand what you are saying CD, if a man cannot prove his innocence because of lack of evidence , does that mean he is automatically guilty. Of course he isn't! Just because you don't like the the man & he has never hidden the fact he flirts.doesn't make him guilty, he may have lied but the fact remains he was cleared by a jury of equal numbers of male & female .
The accusers have the same problem but in fairness they can also lie, & the reasons for it have been covered on this thread & on the WR thread.
Hang on just a second, Saasher - I was commenting on your post (quoted above ^^) where you said "he may have lied but"
I asked why you think it is acceptable that he may have lied and managed to get away with it.
If you're referring to your link to a newspaper article (at Post 45), then that is hardly evidence. It is a journalist's viewpoint.
If Miranda Moore is offended, then so be it. 
PS - I'm going to apologise for not keeping up with all the posts, I can't get used to this new format. In the good old days, the newest post just used to appear at the bottom of the thread. This new system has replies leaping around all over the place and I simply cannot find them all, therefore miss a lot!
I'm going to say goodnight now, anyway - Goodnight all 
