I understand what you are saying CD, if a man cannot prove his innocence because of lack of evidence , does that mean he is automatically guilty. Of course he isn't! Just because you don't like the the man & he has never hidden the fact he flirts.doesn't make him guilty, he may have lied but the fact remains he was cleared by a jury of equal numbers of male & female .
The accusers have the same problem but in fairness they can also lie, & the reasons for it have been covered on this thread & on the WR thread.

Hang on just a second, Saasher - I was commenting on your post (quoted above ^^)  where you said "he may have lied but"

I asked why you think it is acceptable that he may have lied and managed to get away with it.