A pair of Ist Period Worcester plates

[thebestanswerforyourquery]

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/295134772838?hash=item44b7673e66:g:Qp8AAOSwulBiMIoP

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/295144571817?hash=item44b7fcc3a9:g:q7IAAOSwdLdiE4an

I noticed these plates from the same seller. Then I noticed that, when carefully looking at them as instructed by the seller because the photos form part of the descriptions,  the crescent mark, a burst glaze bubble, a trailing blue splodge and an edge crack are placed in relation to each other in the same way on both plates. I think the plates are one plate. What is going on?

[steve19620_13]

Looking at the links posted- I think you are correct.
Benefit of doubt to the seller? used the same photos in error?

[thebestanswerforyourquery]

The photos are not the same, not quite the same angles or distances or cropping.

[thebestanswerforyourquery]

It could be someone even more muddled than me (they must exist) but you'ld think they'ld notice they had listed a First Period Worcester plate twice unless they have a lot of them which is possible as they seem to deal in Early Worcester.

[thebestanswerforyourquery]

I wonder whether the seller has an assistant who has worked with a file of photos and not realised these seemingly different plates were the same one.

It is against eBay rules to list the same article twice; the possible headaches it could cause are obvious. 

[steve19620_13]

Hopefully it's just an oversight, and nothing untoward. If listing a lot of items and say on average 5-6 photos per item, just saying?
Have you contacted the seller?