29-06-2025 10:54 AM
The normal meaning of this term would be a charge imposed by statute of a public authority. In fact, in the case of eBay, it is not something they are OBLIGED BY LAW to charge but want to charge because they want to make more money and they can. Running any business is expensive so the more money you can demand from your customers, the better.
29-06-2025 12:05 PM
My understanding of it for ebay is that it's a fee they charge to cover some or all of their costs in complying with legal regulations that apply to them.
The alternative would have been to raise fees across the board, but they chose not to do that.
29-06-2025 12:17 PM
When the Regulatory Operating Fee was introduced in April 2024 it applied to every account - both Business and Private - and the charge, supposedly, covered the cost of reporting sales data to HMRC under the new UK digital sales reporting requirements.
Although the Regulatory Operating Fee was subsequently dropped for Private sellers when eBay scrapped sellers' fees it remains for Business sellers, which is itself somewhat curious: how come it costs eBay to report business sales to HMRC but not private sales, especially when Private sellers (including businesses trading on Private accounts) are the ones most likely to be avoiding declaring income?
The other issue is one of cost: the Fee is 0.35% of the total amount of each sale. A computer extract file only needs to be written once so the cost is fixed, but eBay's ongoing charge for the 'service' of reporting sales is, quite simply, a fee-grab.
The Regulatory Operating Fee in its current form is iniquitous in that it is only paid by businesses, the accounts least likely to under-declare income for tax purposes. I wrote (to a friend) when it was introduced that introducing the fee was just cynical opportunism by eBay who saw it as a way to increase income whilst blaming 'circumstances beyond their control'. I have seen nothing to disabuse me of that belief.
Still: it's eBay's site, eBay's rules. Other selling platforms are available...
29-06-2025 12:39 PM
If you've ever seen an American phone bill you'd be shocked at how many charges, fees and other additions they add (although this was a few years back), with obscure names that you'd have to dig through the small print and then usually look at a link elsewhere to see what it actually related to.
I think on one bill I got there were 8-9 'supplemental' charges, fees and taxes, there was no doubt it was just additional profiteering and has been standard business practice in the US for decades.
29-06-2025 2:46 PM
@pillarboxred wrote:... Running any business is expensive so the more money you can demand from your customers, the better.
Not true. The more money you can demand from your customers UNTIL resulting profits go down, the better.
Not to mention reputational damage, but when you're already in the toilet on that it becomes irrelevant.