23-10-2020 10:18 AM - edited 23-10-2020 10:19 AM
The Trade Descriptions Act 1968 made it an offence for businesses or salespeople to sell a product or service based on misinformation. The Act forced them to be more truthful about their service or product and not deliberately mislead consumers into spending their money on a false claim.
A relatively cheap item was not fit for purpose. Only option is to ask for a refund, which invokes a return. Posting back is cost to me over half the amount I paid for the item. This seller is clearly selling items not fit for purpose, as latest feedback is that others are getting the same.
The buyer is selling items in a grey area. Selling stock, making money, doesn't have to pay for postage back. I spend more than I get back, stuck with a piece of plastic that is straight into the recycling. They win, I lose.
Is this now the eBay norm?
Adding to the advice already given -
After showing your knowledge of Trade Descriptions Act you then say -
“A relatively cheap item was not fit for purpose. Only option is to ask for a refund, which invokes a return. Posting back is cost to me over half the amount I paid for the item.”
Showing that you have not bothered to read eBay / PayPal buyer protection the only thing relevant here.
Best just use the protection eBay gave you.
The neg you left just repeats “AVOID” over a dozen times, which would not inform others or put them off.