should buyer or seller leave feedback first

[tritoncolin]

Who should leave feedback first,buyer or seller? As a buyer only, I am always prepared to leave feedback first, but I am finding an icreasing number of sellers just don't bother to leave any. I have now decided to leave feedback only to sellers who leave it first..I think feedback is important and Ebay should make it compulsary and deduct points from anyone who fails to leave it.

[tsmgmd]

If a so called eBay reputable seller can have stacks of negative and neutral feedback it makes a mockery of the whole system. 

And if one party in a transaction is restricted to positive feedback only that makes a mockery of the system. 

If a non paying bidder action is registered with eBay then eBay themselves should place feedback on the bidders feedback. 

[*knight-rider*]

`If a so called eBay reputable seller can have stacks of negative and neutral feedback it makes a mockery of the whole system.`

Especially if your leaving a neg to warn others and they just constantly get removed, which has happened to negs i`ve left this year, hence why i no longer leave feedback at all anymore.

[plpmr]

4ufromfiley

“If a non paying bidder action is registered with eBay then eBay themselves should place feedback on the bidders feedback.”

That shows you don't understand unpaid strikes – there's no need for an 'eBay' placed neg.

[tsmgmd]

Regarding non payer strikes.

Have we ever seen or heard of a account been closed. And after all my years on eBay I fully understand how the system works.

If the strike system works like the eBay reputable seller system then God help us all.

The whole feedback system is flawed.

But then look at ebay in general and everything is geared for the buyer.