25-07-2020 8:01 AM
The Returns process has some ‘less than transparent’ murky corners one of which tripped me up the other day.
I purchased an item (car seat overs) which did not fit so started the Returns process to send them back. As the reason for the return I ticked ‘Did not fit’ and arrived at the point where I was told how much I would have to pay to send the items back. The item did not fit because it was ‘Not as Described’ (Specifically the listing said the seat covers fitted a Skoda Octavia and covered the headrests. They did not covered the headrests). OK my bad for picking the wrong reason but the significance of the choice of reason is not at all clear at the point where you make the decision.
I was unable to go back through the Returns process to change the reason and therefore abandoned the Return (closed the web page) – after all I had not finished the process nor, as far as I was aware, had I submitted the Return.
I then started another Return so I could correct the Reason for Return but was told I already had a Return. I was unclear why as I had neither completed nor submitted the return and totally unaware of the implications. (Why are you not warned of you cancel youcannto start another one!) So I cancelled it.
But it seems cancelling the return does not make it go away – it simply stays there and thus prevents me from starting a new return. This is illogical and inconsistent.
Best practice (used most everywhere on eBay), is to collect information from the user, and then summarise it and ask for confirmation he wants to proceed. Not so, it seems, with ebay Returns. Indeed, it is very unclear when the Return comes into life.
Anyway the upshot of all this is that, I am unable to return at the buyer's expense an item that is ‘not as described’ - something that is a cornerstone of ebay’s buyer protection policy and I consider that to be unfair at best.
As you've discovered, 'Does not fit' applies only to items which are as described but simply don't fit as expected, meaning the return will be at the buyer's expense. Sellers are only responsible for return costs when an item arrives 'Not as described' in some way. I personally find this perfectly clear, but I accept that others may not. To lodge your complaint, you'll need to write direct to Ebay's UK headquarters in Richmond - do a web search for the full address.
You can't edit an opened return request, or reopen a closed one, or open another. You say you've closed it, so you'll be able to open a NAD case in PayPal now. Ignore any prompts to return to Ebay, and keep scrolling till you reach the relevant link. The return will be at your expense, so check before opening a case to see if you're eligible for PayPal's 'returns on us' scheme, if it's still running. If so, you'll be able to lodge a claim for a postage refund, once tracking proves delivery back to the seller's registered address.
There's a very good reason indeed for not being able to do that. If buyers had that option, think what would happen when they discover that does-not-fit returns, eg, are to be returned at their expense, but they could go back in and make changes, ie. simply change the reason to one that forced the seller to pay. That abuse of the Money Back Guarantee (buyers making false claims of NAD to force the seller to pay) is already rife. And there is nothing at all the seller can do to contest the fraud as it can't be proved to Ebay - all they can do, after they've refunded through gritted teeth, is to report the buyer to Ebay for abusing the MBG, and hope that enough identical reports from other sellers have been received, enough to get the buyer booted off the site. It won't get the seller their money back - the only way a seller can do that is to take legal action against the buyer. Which is a simple enough process, but a lengthy pain in the butt for busy sellers.
@rincewindwiz