Stephen Walters

[short380]

Wrote to Stephen on 04.01.16 and received my photo back today.  As it was a dark photo and, I presume he had only a blue Sharpie, he has signed it on the back and not the front!!

"http://tinypic.com?ref=5myd5u" target="                      "http://tinypic.com?ref=1e280h" target="

[serenamorgan]

a shame he signed the back but a nice reply all the same

[loobyloo6]

At least it came back signed, would have been difficult to see that on the printed side. Nice one.

[thehornets]

Glad you got a reply. It's part of the ttm game. We can never be prepared for what pens the people we write to have, so when we only have dark images to send, either hope they have something suitable or send a suitable pen with the request. If I send a dark image, I do add a note apologising forthe image being dark, but asking for the signature on the front as the photo will be displayed in an album. Even that does not guarantee a sig on the front, but al we can do is try.

[westiesx2]

Nice reply. Shame he signed the back but as you say, maybe the dark photo!

[film4watcher]

It is frustrating when people sign the back but, at least you got your sig, Garry.

[Anonymous]

Nice reply pity it was done on the back, one of the reasons I try to avoid sending dark pics if I can help it

[obree]

Well done I've had a few of my cards signed on the back it is annoying .