She was described by the receptionist as being very drunk on arrival, McDonald on leaving said to the same receptionist that she was in a bad condition and needed looking after.Her condition on awakening indicated she had been in a poor state .The trial judge commented much the same.
You have to accept, that they heard all the evidence, not just snippets from Evans website
she sent messages the next day
That's simply not correct - not even what evans own site said
There's nothing of substance to support the authenticity or context to those supposed tweets, which Evans own website claims were posted about 5 months after the assault
The cps decided what if any charges were to be brought from interviewing those concerned, the victim had no recollection of events beyond a certain time
It was reported that Evans sister had asked for the victims a/c to be 'hacked'
both mother and sister have social media a/cs though his mothers alternates between private/public.Evans cousin was one of the 9 out of 6000 who posted the victims identity online and were later charged
The DCI in charge of the investigation said he would have liked to have prosecuted more, but resources available to him were insufficient to do so
The 'hate mail' as you call it was /is serious enough for the police to provide a new identity, remove all past traces of the victim, not once, but several times - something only normally available in witness protection programmes and cases like Thompson Venables, seldom if ever for such victims, such is the seriousness of threats
As for OAFC my understanding is there is no police action/complaint resulting from the alleged comment made re an OA director, though it was quickly condemned by campaigners on face value
I have seen nothing of the same from Evans supporters condemning large numbers of similar and worse highly graphic threats against legitimate legal peaceful protesters
There have been now hundreds of such threats physical and otherwise against campaigners, mainly but not exclusively by Evans supporters/football 'fans'
The question of consent or lack of it was established from the evidence presented in court
Those judging Evans do so on the basis he's a convicted rapist - that's a legal fact.Its entirely possible that hes a serial rapist, but that, like suggesting he's really innocent is mere speculation. Im sure for certain elements regardless of evidence he would always be innocent because some, particularly in some cases the chav element, would wish it so, but its no more than a wish
Evans has had the best of British justice his future father in law can buy
including a review by the Lord Chief Justice and two other senior appeal court judges,as well as single judge on first application. He remains a convicted rapist. The ccrc is just another last straw to clutch on to having used up his quota. His prospective f.i.l appears to be willing to table 2 million to tempt a club into hiring him. No offender on release has anywhere near that kind of support in general, and face considerable difficulties in rehabilitation, none of which Evans has to face. His victim has had to leave her father and siblings, and the victim remains unable to return to her remaining family
The PFA and football have made efforts to remove certain types of behaviour from the game, with some success. At the moment Taylor looks out of touch and myopic regarding some forms of behaviour.
Public positions come with public responsibilities.Most have to forfeit those on conviction
Currently football remains an exception to that
Greater Manchester Police today confirmed NO complaints of threats have been received from OAFC
7ryMJjyBMgowKMZdQ~~_7.JPG "cee-dee"){kind=avatar}
r9)c!s!BMe7Sm0zi!~~_7.JPG "electric*mayhem*band"){kind=avatar}
