What if?

OK, so no-one wants to argue any more but what if.........................

 

A couple of years back referendum was called about either staying in or leaving the EU and the majority voted to leave. Since then arguments have raged back and forth and the remainers are agitating for another referendum.

 

What if they had another vote and this time the result was to remain BUT, then the leavers started agitating for another making claims for this, that or the other? Would the remainers claim "We had a democratic vote so that's that, we remain IN".

 

We had a democratic vote before though? The result of that was to LEAVE so if a second vote went the other way would any notice be taken of leavers wanting yet another?? If not, why not?

 

Shouldn't a vote on something be IT as regards any result not a cause for those who didn't like the result to agitate for another? Where does it end?

 

By that reckoning it could result in a parliamentry vote for a constituency which ended in a close vote for one person then having those opposed to then claim it was "close" so they demand another go? How many "go's" do you want?



It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

Message 1 of 266
See Most Recent
265 REPLIES 265

What if?

May wins, 325 to 306.



It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

Message 261 of 266
See Most Recent

What if?

DxDl1r0WwAE2nhB.jpg





We are many,They are few
Message 262 of 266
See Most Recent

What if?

Absolutely...without any doubt...NO DEAL. We have to leave on March 29th. If we leave it too long there will be new EU elections, and new Commissioners. It was pointed out yesterday that any 'assurances' and 'concessions' given by the present commissioners won't be honoured by new commissioners after their elections.

After listening to the speech by Sir Bill Cash, I am even more convinced that we should leave without a deal. On March 29th.

Message 263 of 266
See Most Recent

What if?

And yes Creeks....they are that clever! They will do anything to keep their project going. Their whole history has been founded on deceit and secrecy. 

Message 264 of 266
See Most Recent

What if?

Aye-aye, what's crawling out of the woodwork now?:-

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46951942

 

Hmmmmmm, Mr Tusk tells the three-part show that he warned the then prime minister there was "no appetite for revolution in Europe" ...... So what's that happening in France at the moment? Looks like a revolution to me, what about you?

 

Mr Sarkozy reveals how he warned Mr Cameron about his attempt at strong-arm tactics with EU leaders over concessions on migrant rules and integration, telling him: "If you try to break our arm, you'll get nothing." Looks like the EU are determined to enforce that statement?



It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

Message 265 of 266
See Most Recent

What if?

 Tusk said: “I asked David Cameron, ‘Why did you decide on this referendum,....I was really amazed and even shocked – that the only reason was his own party.”

 

I think most people now realise it was just done to try and placate the tory right wingers,and Cameron never expected leave to win

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/21/donald-tusk-warned-david-cameron-about-stupid-eu-refer...





We are many,They are few
Message 266 of 266
See Most Recent