20-05-2013 11:02 AM
OK, I know there's already an old thread on the subject but rather than lose track, I thought a new thread would be more likely to discuss the new finding rather than go over old ground:-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22566230
From that you'll see that when it suits "them", eye witness evidence is disregarded.
Now, eye witness evidence is often very unreliable, people "see" what they think they see rather than what they saw BUT.... eye witness evidence is valuable in that it can point to what I call "real" evidence and in that news item you can see that people said what they saw but the real evidence backing up what they said was there all along but wasn't produced.
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
20-05-2013 11:29 AM
There's a programme on tonight, BBC 9pm, about why it took so long to uncover the truth.
20-05-2013 7:33 PM
Are peeps gonna watch Panorama?
I'm watching summat else so tell me what you think afterwards?
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.
21-05-2013 8:00 AM
Watched it last night - some of the footage of the day was horrible, and even after all this time gets to you.
heads really should have rolled much earlier. Now, I doubt they will, due to the age of some of the people involved.