Banning smoking in public places.

I see it's being suggested for parts of London. The start of something bigger I hope, though I am sure the smokers think it's the beginning of the end of the World.

Message 1 of 90
See Most Recent
89 REPLIES 89

Banning smoking in public places.


@electric*mayhem*band wrote:

@haryinprague wrote:

 and it's estimated that 80 percent of road litter comes from dirty smokers who think the norms of a civilized society do not apply to them.

Well I don't know from where you gleaned that bit of information. The litter you speak of wouldn't be from empty drink cans and cartons, polystyrene take-away trays, sweet and chocolate wrappers, crisp bags, plastic carrier bags, soiled nappies, half eaten kebabs and pizzas, etc, etc, would it,  ? No of course not, just a few fag ends and the odd empty cigarette packet.


Hary actually has a very good point regarding litter, a lot comes from cigarette butts and it is too much of a usual habit for people to discard them on the floor/out of the car window.

 

I don't agree with much Hary has said but I do agree that smoking related litter is a problem!

Message 41 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.


@023mjc wrote:

 

 

Your comparison to slavery and wars is rediculous, and it's an insult to the brave lads who fought to compare their sacrifice to something so trivial. Many is the soldier in the trenches who's only relief from the misery was a ciggie.

 

 

 


Actually it is not ridiculous it is perfectly easy to understand; people deflect attention away from the issue by bringing other issues into question.

 

One person questions the negative social impact of smoking/nicotine, someone else says "but what about alcohol?" One person questions smoking related litter and someone else says "but what about McDonalds?" So the point being made is you may as well use any contentious issue to deflect attention from the question in hand; is it right to question smoking when there's famine in Africa, during an Ebola outbreak, while Islamic State are running riot?! The point of choosing an issue far removed from the one in hand is to highlight more easily the bogu nature of the deflection tactic!

Message 42 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

lambsy_uk
Conversationalist

The thing I don't like about the proposal is the reasoning behind it.

 

" the aim of discouraging children from taking up the habit."

 

With the state constantly encroaching on our lives the thing that gives me most satisfaction is my parental responsibility. It is my responsibility to guide my children and influence the way they respond to social stimuli. In other words if my children are influenced by seeing someone smoking in the park, influenced to such an extent that they start smoking; then I will have failed.

 

So the proposal is actually a proposal to mitigate failed parenting! I know my children won't be smoking, what about yours?!

 

So why not tackle the causes if you want to tackle the problem?, the cause being feckless parents! If parents are not capable of influencing their children in a manner suited to their best interests, then remove the children from that environment!

 

Of course it won't happen and for several reasons; firstly people can't handle the truth and will use all sorts of excuses and it will be deemed socially unacceptable. So don't tackle the cause just tackle the symptoms; a bit like trying to treat people with Ebola rather than prevent them from getting it!

 

And further; this proposal comes from the Health Commission who need to continually find issues to justify their existence; if this is achieved they will be onto the next thing and one day it may be an issue that effects you!

Message 43 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

I think the 80% of litter is playing with statistics , I'm sure that is by number of items

 

So they are saying a Cig Butt is equal to a MacDs box, when it plainly isin't

Message 44 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

 

@al**bear wrote:

I think the 80% of litter is playing with statistics , I'm sure that is by number of items

 

So they are saying a Cig Butt is equal to a MacDs box, when it plainly isin't


 

I don't think there's any value in comparing one piece of litter to another; in my opinion throwing a cigarette end or a McDonalds box out of a car window amounts to the same thing; a slovenly littering git!!!

 

If you want to compare items then which criteria would you use? Weight, volume, surface area, compound, health threat. You may not equate a metal bottle top to a McDonalds box but I know which will cause more damage if you fall on it while playing football. You may not equate a plastic bottle top to a McDonalds box but I know which one is more likely to kill an animal!

 

All litter has an impact in some way, the problem with cigarette butts is it's often the case that the same person who will walk over to a bin to deposit their McDonalds with not think twice about discarding a cigarette butt on the floor!

Message 45 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

I wouldn't go as far as blaming parents for everything kids do,but see your point ,and too true on health commisions need to exist.

Message 46 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.


@joamur_gosof wrote:

I wouldn't go as far as blaming parents for everything kids do,


Parents are responsible for their children, it is not only a social norm but it is written in law. If you are responsible then you are to blame.

 

I accept this, the problem is too many make excuses and want to blame anything but themselves!!!

 

They'll take credit for all the wonderful things their kids do; "Oh I'm so proud little Britney got a gold star for tying her shoe laces and there was me thinking she'd never manage anything but velcro", then "It's not my fault she stated smoking at 13, I always hid my fags away and told her I'd give her a right good slapping if I ever caught her smoking, so it ain't my fault"!

 

 

Message 47 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

again I do see your point but again it isn't as cut and dry as that (great if it was) 

 

Individuals are exactly that and guidance is also exactly that,mental illness is exactly that and so on and so on ,although I do agree parenting is very important to children in guiding them it is also not infallible

Message 48 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

Not defending litter, but rain destroys 'cig butts' and they biodegrade most litter doesn't

Message 49 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.


@joamur_gosof wrote:

again I do see your point but again it isn't as cut and dry as that (great if it was) 

 

Individuals are exactly that and guidance is also exactly that,mental illness is exactly that and so on and so on ,although I do agree parenting is very important to children in guiding them it is also not infallible


There's always going to be exceptions where some of the Worlds best parented kids still fall foul, however if more people aimed for high standards rather than excusing themselves we could actually achieve something.

 

Human nature tells me not to hold my breath though; the easy way out is the course most readily taken!

Message 50 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

Well whether a cigarette butt or anything else, littering tells me something about the person doing it, something not very nice!

 

So I have no problem with people smoking in public places as long as they dispose of their litter responsibly! Seeing someone smoking has little or no effect on me but seeing someone littering make me want to bludgen them!

Message 51 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

Sorry but parents are not responsible for their childrens' behaviour in a lot of cases.  Nanny state has long since totally undermined THAT responsibility in fact if not in name.  You bring your children up, you set a good example, one gets a little bit uppity, meets the wrong people, threatens you with Police or Childline if you do anything to stop them and ask for help and you can forget it.  The state is on their side.   Not all parents whose children smoke or get in trouble are feckless and uncaring - just normal people trying their best. At least, parents are responsible but responsibilty without the power to act is not responsibility.  If you don't have problems you do not realise how helpless you actually are.

 

Talking to the Police they said the only thing we could logically do with one of ours to keep her safe and out of trouble was lock her in her bedroom AND that if we did and they found out they would take action against us.  Yes, there were reasons for her behaviour, however when we begged for help(repeatedly) we were ignored by everybody.  When push came to shove it cost the taxpayer a whole lot more than a bit of help earlier would have.  Her main problem - teenager with older sibling with major health issues so was no longer centre of attention(and I mean CENTRE).  Somebody else we know has exactly the same problem now with their young teenage daughter - nobody is willing to help, well nobody he can access, same scenario repeated. Either give real responsibility back to parents or provide the help families need when they need it.. Our biggest problem - 2 parent, long term married, working families are not even on the radar as needing help where I live!

 

Smoking? - yes she tried that as well.  No we do not smoke, none of our friends smoke, none of our relatives smoke, cigarettes were never seen in our house. Her "friends" however did smoke and happily provided her with the wherewithal!

Message 52 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

I do smoke, my children don't nor they tell me will they ever as it stinks (I know)  15,16 and 20 so thats the exact reverse of bhgardens,I actually put them off it,and yes some of their friends do and some don't.

 

The country has major problems thanks to years of govs interfering instead of supporting ,it is as simple as that,and this latest brainwave on smoking is just another interfere for more control over all of us.

Ban it altogether from being sold or making revenue is the only suggestion that should be discussed round parliment,if yes do it if no,then leave it up to individual estashblishments to enforce whatever they see fit.

 

 

Message 53 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.


@al**bear wrote:

Not defending litter, but rain destroys 'cig butts' and they biodegrade most litter doesn't


That is exactly the sort of thinking that needs to be challenged, exactly the sort of thing that has the smoking slob whining like a 747 on full throttle when a street warden fines him for littering because "it's only a fag end". Smokers WANT their fag buts to not be litter and harmless but they are simply wrong on both counts.

 

As one poster has already said, the person who consciencesly places his burger box in the litter bin seems to think his fag end can go on the floor! That's the difference! People know ful well that their chewing gum paper cannot be thrown on ther floor, tbut when it comes to that fag end!

 

Somebody was trying to quantify how bad certain litter is compared to that humble fag end. Well.......

 

http://www.cigarettelitter.org/index.asp?pagename=facts

 

They are not biodegradable in the sense you would like to believe, and what is more, if you can find a dirtier from of litter, loaded with a huge list of toxic chemicals, tar and saliva then I'm all ears! They are filthy and poisonous, it's that simple.

 

 

Message 54 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

Ban it altogether from being sold or making revenue is the only suggestion that should be discussed round parliment,if yes do it if no,then leave it up to individual estashblishments to enforce whatever they see fit.

 

I don't want to see it banned, I want people banned from doing it around me. As to your last sentence, that would be a return to some very dark days for those of us who object to sharing this drug with the users.

 

Message 55 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

lol/''smoking slob'' is it now hahah ,I have worked every working day of my life ,I haven't found time to insult people yet..perhaps when I retire I will find enough time on my hands to slob about calling folk names . hohohoho

Message 56 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

heehehe  I want breathing in public banned ,I tell you I am lobbying for support 😄  not a total ban just slobs ,you know what I mean

Message 57 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

lol/''smoking slob'' is it now hahah ,I have worked every working day of my life ,I haven't found time to insult people yet.

 

If he throws a cigarette end on the floor, he IS a smoking slob just as somebody who throws down a a Burger box may be a non-smoking slob.

 

If you choose to read it as an insult aimed at all smokers then you would be wrong, but I believe it's a factual statement that could be applied to most smokers considering how many seem to think they are exempt from littering laws and the civilised standards that most of us adhere to.

 

Of course, if you rarely see smokers just flick that butt away then you obviously have a better class of smoker where you are.

Message 58 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.

I get the issue OP,I also think littering is one issue and smoking is another. The prime objective here does not appear to be to stop littering (there are hefty penalties in place for doing that) it's to make the outside a healthy place for folks lungs...which if you think about it is nonsense as if that is the aim the list of things to stop is huge as is being pointed out.

 

Yes to some of your points, no to categorizing people .jmo

Message 59 of 90
See Most Recent

Banning smoking in public places.


@bhgardeners wrote:

Sorry but parents are not responsible for their childrens' behaviour in a lot of cases.  Nanny state has long since totally undermined THAT responsibility in fact if not in name.  You bring your children up, you set a good example, one gets a little bit uppity, meets the wrong people, threatens you with Police or Childline if you do anything to stop them and ask for help and you can forget it.  The state is on their side.   Not all parents whose children smoke or get in trouble are feckless and uncaring - just normal people trying their best. At least, parents are responsible but responsibilty without the power to act is not responsibility.  If you don't have problems you do not realise how helpless you actually are.

 

Talking to the Police they said the only thing we could logically do with one of ours to keep her safe and out of trouble was lock her in her bedroom AND that if we did and they found out they would take action against us.  Yes, there were reasons for her behaviour, however when we begged for help(repeatedly) we were ignored by everybody.  When push came to shove it cost the taxpayer a whole lot more than a bit of help earlier would have.  Her main problem - teenager with older sibling with major health issues so was no longer centre of attention(and I mean CENTRE).  Somebody else we know has exactly the same problem now with their young teenage daughter - nobody is willing to help, well nobody he can access, same scenario repeated. Either give real responsibility back to parents or provide the help families need when they need it.. Our biggest problem - 2 parent, long term married, working families are not even on the radar as needing help where I live!

 

Smoking? - yes she tried that as well.  No we do not smoke, none of our friends smoke, none of our relatives smoke, cigarettes were never seen in our house. Her "friends" however did smoke and happily provided her with the wherewithal!


Parents are always responsible, go see who is going to be sued if a child causes criminal damage! A parent who does not accept total responsibility has surrendered their duty as a parent and passed it off! Do parents want the responsibility or do they wish to hand it over to the state?

 

A Mother or Father who does not accept all responsibility is not a parent! A parent takes responsibility otherwise they are just the sperm donor and carrier!

 

Nanny state does undermine responsibility but too many are quite happy to hand it over and wash their hands, no parent worth their salt would do so! If a child gets uppity, meets the wrong people and threatens their parents with the Police then the parents have not set them a good enough example and have failed as a parent! Parents whose kids smoke and get into trouble may not be uncaring but they have shown that their best was not good enough! If their best isn't good enough that makes them incompetent!

 

If it was a job of work incopetence would not be tollerated so why are so many so ready to tollerate it when it comes to parenting?!

 

Parents do have the power to act they just fail to use it properly!

 

If a child is in a situation where Police are involved and locking them in their bedroom is the only course of action that seems applicable then something went wrong long before that time. What went on before for such a state of affairs to ever come about?! Begging for help when all hell breaks loose is too late, prevention is better than cure and it should never get close to such a situation.

 

"No longer centre of attention", why were they centre of attention in the first place? And you even emphasised CENTRE!!!

 

The problem was not that they were no longer the centre of attention it is that they were ever the centre of attention to start with. Prevention rather than cure, the problem was created and then the stable door needs closing after the horse has come to the attention of the Police!

 

Somebody else you know has the same problems, no surprise; "Birds of a Feather Flock Together"!

 

If my girls end up smoking or even hanging around with kids who do then I will have failed, it will be my fault for not guiding them effectively enough. If all parents took such responsibility upon themselves and accepted that it is always their fault we could perhaps create a better society. It is the lack of parent willingness to accept such responsibility that leads to the state having to intervene leading to the mess and conflict described above.

 

I would suggest you stop looking for help and take control; you are the parent, the ultimate in guidance, duty and responsibility. It may be too late because the horse has already bolted but you could at least give it a try and accept your own role in it all, it could be cathartic.

Message 60 of 90
See Most Recent