cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

How does this not constitute a breach of the User Agreement?

Seller listed an item with a few choices, prices starting low for sample-sized options, rising to realistic prices for a viable quantity.   However, they also included a "not for sale" entry at 99p.

 

This is, in my mind, straight forward search manipulation.   I've seen a million times a completely unrelated item at ridiculously low prices in order to get to the top of the list on a low-to-high price ordering but I've never seen someone openly list a non-existent item to manipulate the results [and get away with it].

 

So I reported the listing, received a "declined" note from the AI and appealed it, only to receive a second "declined" message, supposedly, after a manual review.

 

The reason for the decline is that "no rules were broken", except this is the very first rule on the User Agreement!

 

What is the policy?

  • Manipulating search results to gain unfair visibility of a listing is not allowed

Is there a way to escalate the complaint further?   I have no real skin in the game here, I'm not selling, I'm not a competitor, I didn't buy the non-existent item, but I feel strongly that this is exactly why eBay is going down the drain and why it is no longer my first choice of market place.

Is it even worth trying to user-police the site if they themselves don't care about sellers taking the mickey?

Message 1 of 2
See Most Recent
1 REPLY 1

How does this not constitute a breach of the User Agreement?

I am afraid that reporting rules being broken, produces this result, that no rules have been broken. Appealing and supposedly being looked at by an agent profuces the same response.

 

Even quoting the rules achieves nothing, but ebay will jump on other members for minor or even no breaking of rules. Seems to me that AI and agents need to have a better idea of what they are supposed to be doing.

Message 2 of 2
See Most Recent