27-09-2013 6:29 PM
I have just purchased the Michael Clarke Duncan photo. I did query with the seller before buying whether it was a genuine autograph or a PP and they said they were not 100% sure but have agreed to refund my money if I am not happy with it when I have received it. I must admit I do believe it is a PP although I am not entirely sure and any opinions would be helpful. There is a slight smudge over the u in Duncan but I am not totally convinced it is hand signed. Any opinions would be helpful although it is not the best picture due to the light from the flash. I feel I will be returning it but will see what you all think.
27-09-2013 6:41 PM
I know nothing about this signature however a quick google search and there are a few of the same pics all signed differently which would suggest it's not a pp
27-09-2013 7:40 PM
cant help you , dont even know who he is
27-09-2013 10:24 PM
Sorry can't help
28-09-2013 8:49 AM
Interesting. I had a little mooch on eBay.
Ignore this first seller for authenticity. They have the same image as your seller. Not sure which one the image originated from have not looked further -
This guy in the USA had the same pic with an indentical picture, but the timeframe would have allowed your seller with a different id to buy, so it could be the same one you bought
but looking at google I found this which is teh same as yours -
and this with same sig in different position which suggests autopen -
28-09-2013 3:09 PM
Thank you all for your help and thank you for spending your time looking Nigel. It is appreciated. I honestly think it is autopen. As soon as I took it out of the envelope it did not look right. I think I will ask for a refund.
Thank you again.