25-08-2013 3:09 PM
I had to use tiny.url 'cos the original URL was massive.
If you click on the link it will take you to a newspaper report about the state of the house after his wife and kids moved out.
25-08-2013 4:34 PM
.Who say its going to cost £6000.... I would clean it for a £1000..Tommy .Irene.....He may have gone but we're still paying for him: Taxpayer foots £6,000 bill to clean Abu Qatada's filthy house after he was deported to Jordan
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2400813/He-gone-paying-Taxpayer-foots-6-000-clean-Abu-Qatada...
25-08-2013 5:52 PM
What gets to my core is the ''selfishness'' of Qatada, and his wife, that shows no gratitude to us whatsoever.
Not as far as I'm aware have they or any of their family offered one word of thanks. And how selfish to ignore the thoughts of contempt drummed up by their attitude to us. Which hardly improves matters for their fellow Muslims that they have left behind. Selfish indeed.
Yes that's right..The sun has set on one of the greatest empires when it slavishly caters to those who hold it in contempt.
It does show the lack of gratitude and respect to us if they leave a place in that state. Reminds me of a boat we hired last summer on the Broads...we were obliged out of common curtsey and respect to return it clean and undamaged, or we where highly likely not to be allowed back. I hope this just might be remembered by the government should they try to come back?
(oh yes!!! don't be surprised....)
25-08-2013 10:06 PM
26-08-2013 1:14 AM
What gets to my core is the ''selfishness'' of Qatada, and his wife, that shows no gratitude to us whatsoever.
I expect the same could apply to a number of council ands HA tenants who move out leaving a costly mess to clean up and repair.
26-08-2013 9:39 AM
#10
Not quite the same as far as we know they are not HATE preachers. And that's a BIG difference.
The OP' was ''specifically'' about Abu Qatada.
Should we start our comments by mentioning what some Council tenants do? Or on what the topic is about?
Which for some reason you (and some others) don't seem to want to do.
Hundreds and hundreds quite often on the mail on line '''COMMENTS'' often do, and are right now on that link T.I. & Steve, posted.
Used to quite a lot on here, but only a couple in about a day on the RT, strange that
And #10 - 01:14 AM is far too late for me, but if you want to start a thread on BAD council ands HA house tenants?
(ands HA?) Will join in willingly.
PS It is perfectly acceptable for you to post my whole post rather than EDIT it That explains a bit why they are so ''SELFISH''.
26-08-2013 9:50 AM
At a guess, HA = Housing Associations in this context.
26-08-2013 2:20 PM
Not quite the same as far as we know they are not HATE preachers. And that's a BIG difference.
But is it such a big difference? Apart from that is, of being more annoying for obvious reasons.
The simple fact is there are those who, when in possession of other people's property, do not care how they treat it.
27-08-2013 3:54 PM
Unless I haven't woke up yet or missed something it was me that said that - NOT Steve?
'But is it such a big difference' ??? YOU say.
IT IS IF SOMEONE IS INFLUENCED ENOUGH BY A HATE PREACHER TO GO OUT AND BLOW INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BITS.
Now lets pop over to the mail on line ''COMMENTS'' again, hundreds there. In almost two days a few on here
(it just don't figure somehow).
I do wonder why? ........well not really
27-08-2013 11:36 PM
IT IS IF SOMEONE IS INFLUENCED ENOUGH BY A HATE PREACHER TO GO OUT AND BLOW INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BITS.
But where is the connection between that and leaving the house in a mess.