Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

http://tinyurl.com/kztchdr

 

I had to use tiny.url 'cos the original URL was massive.

If you click on the link it will take you to a newspaper report about the state of the house after his wife and kids moved out.

Message 1 of 10
See Most Recent
9 REPLIES 9

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

.Who say its going to cost £6000.... I would clean it for a £1000..Tommy .Irene.....He may have gone but we're still paying for him: Taxpayer foots £6,000 bill to clean Abu Qatada's filthy house after he was deported to Jordan

  • Abu Qatada's wife and five children moved in to property in Stanmore, North-West London, earlier this year
  • Family moved out of four-bedroom house last week to join him Jordan
  • But property has been left in a poor state with bags of rubbish left outside
  • Will cost taxpayers thousands of pounds to return house to its former state



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2400813/He-gone-paying-Taxpayer-foots-6-000-clean-Abu-Qatada... 

......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................Im a 76 year old Nutcase.. TOMMY LOVES YOU ALL. .. I'm a committed atheist.
Message 2 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

 

 

What gets to my core is the ''selfishness'' of Qatada, and his wife, that shows no gratitude to us whatsoever.

 

Not as far as I'm aware have they or any of their family offered one word of thanks. And how selfish to ignore the thoughts of contempt drummed up by their attitude to us. Which hardly improves matters for their fellow Muslims that they have left behind.  Selfish indeed.

 

Yes that's right..The sun has set on one of the greatest empires when it slavishly caters to those who hold it in contempt.

 

 

It  does show the lack of gratitude and respect to us if they leave a place in that state. Reminds me of a boat we hired last summer on the Broads...we were obliged out of common curtsey and respect to return it clean and undamaged, or we where highly likely not to be allowed back. I hope this just might be remembered by the government should they try to come back?

 

 (oh yes!!! don't be surprised....Man Wink

 

 

 

Message 3 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

Well what do you expect were English we should have signs all around Briton saying come one come all we never refuse anyone all welcome and even if your not welcome with no money and nowhere to live we will give you 5 star treatment with no danger of you been sent back even if you threaten to blow our island up your ok don't worry.
Message 4 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

What gets to my core is the ''selfishness'' of Qatada, and his wife, that shows no gratitude to us whatsoever.

 

I expect the same could apply to a number of council ands HA tenants who move out leaving a costly mess to clean up and repair.

___________________________________________________________
Parents of young, organic life forms are warned that towels can be harmful if swallowed in large quantities.
Message 5 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

 

#10 Man Indifferent

 

Not quite the same as far as we know they are not HATE preachers. And that's a BIG difference.

 

The OP' was ''specifically'' about Abu Qatada.   

 

Should we start our comments by mentioning what some Council tenants do? Or on what the topic is about?

 

Which for some reason you (and some others) don't seem to want to do.

 

Hundreds and hundreds quite often on the mail on line '''COMMENTS'' often do, and are right now on that link T.I. & Steve, posted. 

 

Used to quite a lot on here, but only a couple in about a day on the RT, strange thatMan Wink

 

And #10 - 01:14 AM is far too late for me, but if you want to start a thread on BAD council ands HA house tenants?

 

(ands HA?)  Will join in willingly. 

 

PS It is perfectly acceptable for you to post my whole post rather than EDIT itMan Wink That explains a bit why they are so ''SELFISH''. 

 

Message 6 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

At a guess, HA = Housing Associations in this context.

Message 7 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

Not quite the same as far as we know they are not HATE preachers. And that's a BIG difference.

 

But is it such a big difference? Apart from that is, of being more annoying for obvious reasons.

 

The simple fact is there are those who, when in possession of other people's property, do not care how they treat it.

___________________________________________________________
Parents of young, organic life forms are warned that towels can be harmful if swallowed in large quantities.
Message 8 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

 

Man Surprised

 

Unless I haven't woke up yet or missed something it was me that said that - NOT Steve?

 

 

'But is it such a big difference' ???  YOU say.

 

 

IT IS IF SOMEONE IS INFLUENCED ENOUGH BY A HATE  PREACHER TO GO OUT AND BLOW INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BITS.

 

Now lets pop over to the mail on line ''COMMENTS'' again, hundreds there. In almost two days a few on here Man Wink

(it just don't figure somehow).

 

I  do wonder why? ........well not reallyMan Wink

 

 

 

Message 9 of 10
See Most Recent

Qatada is still costing the taxpayer loads of dosh.

IT IS IF SOMEONE IS INFLUENCED ENOUGH BY A HATE  PREACHER TO GO OUT AND BLOW INNOCENT PEOPLE TO BITS.

 


But where is the connection between that and leaving the house in a mess.

___________________________________________________________
Parents of young, organic life forms are warned that towels can be harmful if swallowed in large quantities.
Message 10 of 10
See Most Recent