You are on a jury and five individuals testified in court that the same individual had molested each of them in a similar fashion and in similar circumstances - despite the best endeavours of the defence no collusion nor ulterior motive could be demonstrated between them.

Witnesses were called that showed that the 'victims' were where they said they were and backed up their peripherary testimony.

Are you saying you would still have a reasonable doubt regarding the guilt of the accused?

Personally I would say that in such circumstances it would be totally unreasonable to return a not-guilty verdict.