The way in which evidence is 'applied' will always be different as it depends as much on the participants in a particular case as it does on the 'quality' of that evidence - the guidelines however remain the same.

Your main concern all through this thread has been concern over the way in which an accusation, (whether that accusation be genuine or not), harms a potential defendant.

What I have been asking is for a few specifics on how that harm can be mitigated without failing to offer 'victims' justice.