@artful_dodgings wrote:@upthecreekyetagain wrote:
'You miss the point - create a martyr and you don't get fewer of these barbaric savages but more!'
No, you miss the point. The point was that was my opinion. Nothing would give me greater satisfaction than seeing terrorists and would be suicide bombers and those of that ilk, given the long drop. In such cases I think an exception should be made. Not sure I buy into your theory that for every one disposed of, others will take their place. That's your opinion. It's not necessarily mine.
'As for cost the the same argument can be made, whatever the crime'.
This thread is concerning Rehman and Khan, and not to anyone else who, for whatever reason, happens to be incarcerated. Do pay attention, Creeky..
And a Happy New Year to you too 
A little case of double standards? 🙂 - You refer to JDL's post to support your stance and try to diminish mine by saying, "This thread is concerning Rehman and Khan, and not to anyone else"
You need to reread what JDL posted - just in case you can't be bothered then here's an extract "Moors murderer Ian Brady has been in various institutions for close on 50 years now, the cost to the taxpayer has been £14 million so far. This is nonsense."
. . . . .
