- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-06-2024 2:32 PM
Please can I get a response to my thread here:
I would be very grateful of this as once again it is about businesses operating on private accounts and the clear issues with the reporting system.
To quote from my thread:
I am now getting this is my response for reporting listings that have a business ltd company name and website address as a watermark:
We looked into your report and didn’t find the listing to be in violation of our policy. This determination was made using automation or artificial intelligence.
How do I escalate this further, what are the next steps?
I am annoyed because last week I had a batch of items removed for violating Ebay policy.
I did not know about the policy so I did not complain and got on with it.
But a big fat can of worms is going to be opened soon because the reason my listings were removed are apparent in not just a handful of other items on the Ebay platform, but hundreds of thousands of items on the platform that account for a huge percentage of Ebays revenue. Tens of millions.
Why should I be victimised and have listings removed for violating policy when these accounts get to continue on the platform illegally tax dodging and violating policy?
I have paid Ebay nearly £130,000 in fees in the past 3 years alone, if I were operating as a private seller and saving on fees I could have shaved £100k off that I nearly paid off my mortgage.
This is not a level playing field, it needs to be addressed, so how do I escalate this further?