The whole thing is very difficult.

On the one had no-one want the guilty to walk free.

On the other hand you wouldn't want to be accused of something and convicted by the say-so of someone who just thought they'd got some sort of grudge to score with?

Then again, there's the guilty who have an excellent defence team shredding an inept police investigation and they've been coached as to how to behave in front of the jury.

There's others where their defence has been a shambles, their own performance unconvincing and the police case heavily weighted against the accused.

I dunno where we drawe the line, lines have to be drawn somewhere?