I'm horrified at the thought that the money he could generate may have been at the root of many people keeping quiet and effectively aiding and abetting child abuse.

Who is worse, the pervert (who presumably some how in their own mind believes that they have a "right" to do what they do), or the observer who fully appreciates the evil being perpetrated but allows it to continue to avoid losing the goose that lays the golden egg?

I believe the allegations being made, it's all coming to thick and fast for me to think otherwise.  At the same time, I did feel a bit uncomfortable when I heard a police officer being interviewed on the news referring to him as a sexual predator, because in our justice system shouldn't the police still be referred to allegations?

I've never liked JS nor have any sympathy for anyone who would hurt a child, but still AFAIK there's not been a full police investigation carried out and until at least that's been done they should at least be seen to be conducting an impartial investiation.