@upthecreekyetagain wrote:

The problem is we do NOT know what Brexit means - we won’t know until the end of the year when negotiations are complete. 


Whatever it means the majority voted for it  --  To Leave.

 

IF the Remainers manage to force another referendum on "The Deal" then that is all it should be on, whether the deal is acceptable or not.  It shouldn't alter the original Leave result.

 

As someone said earlier, where does it end.  If we have another vote on "In" or "Out" when we know what the deal is and it still results in an Out vote do we have another when the transition period ends and all the details are finalised?  And perhaps another, a couple of years after we've left to make sure we still like our decision when we see how things are going?

 

Isn't this a tried and tested trick by the EU.  If they don't get the "right" result the first time, have another vote and sometimes several, until they get the answer they want.  Then, suddenly THAT vote becomes binding.

 

If Cameron had managed to get some "meaningful" concessions from the EU and then called a referendum which was won by the Remain faction.  Would there be any likelyhood of a second vote on the details of that deal?  Of course not.