@cee-dee wrote:

The difference is that we don't introduce our beliefs at every possible opportunity or try to turn the object of a thread towards a minority belief.


Cd, if you really look back on the discussions I have joined what I have done is exactly the same as what every one else does, discuss debate and put another point of view into the mix.

 

I don't do what you do and respond to a post of yours with "arrhhhhh not again" I read with interest your views and respond with mine and where able offer my informations, facts and arguments to back up why I have those views.  I respect and accept people's views.

 

The bottom line is if you need to bring differences into it is you expect a JW to read all your posts and discussions with tolerance, acceptance, understanding and respect for your views but are not prepared (although you say you do) to give the same to them. 

 

You put certain questions or statements out to the public in the hope of a debate or discussion but by how you respond to a JW when they do honestly and respectfully respond you might just as well say open to all except JW's.

 

I can and do discuss topics sometimes when there is no religious and belief connotations in them, I am happy to do so. But CD whether intentional or not many topics of yours do have those kinds of subject matter in them.

 

That is why I felt prompted to reply to this thread in the way I did.  

 

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++
Next mood swing in 6 minutes
++++++++++++++++++++++++