It seems that tempers have been raised over a BBC radio interview about the issue of Climate Change (they don't call it "Global Warming" now?).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-40899188

Now instead of attacking the BBC (and Lawson) it would have been much better the have picked over points raised and refuted them (if possible)?

I don't think there's any doubt that things are warming but it's what's causing it that's at issue. Those taking the climate change position attribute it to human intervention but those taking the opposing view don't seem to make much issue about what's happened on Earth before as shown in the natural "records" in soil samples, tree records and levels of flood deposits, all those when there was very little in the way of "human intervention".