Well now, you said a case involving a single complainant would never go to Court, but..... a case concluded the other day where a man was convicted after a complaint by a single person.

It seems that no matter what happens, your politician's/lawyer's wriggling won't allow you to concede that what one person says is accepted as evidence in one type of case but isn't accepted as evidence in others.

OK, so every case is different, yes, it sure is but the standard of evidence should be the same across the board which has been my stance from the start.