Oh heck, I've got to say "well done" for that contribution.

In a roundabout way though, it's also an excellent illustration of what I said in #299 about:-  "It seems to me like one of those scams where "investors" pay in and those "in" first get what seems like vey high returns but those in late lose all their money when it's discovered that the promoters were using the payments from later investors to pay the high returns to those who "got in on the ground floor" after creaming off loadsa money for themselves."