Read what I said. I said proved to have killed someone?

Again, if capital punishment was to be reintroduced and someone proved beyond doubt (not reasonable doubt, that's not good enough) to have killed someone, the rule of Law would be that the bloke should be executed but there'd be a group (like there is on here) saying he shouldn't be executed.

The majority got the Law changed but those "against" would be adding those who didn't vote to those who voted agains and they'd be saying the true majority didn't vote for the Law to be changed.