The Guardian has more pages and not just on DC

First, a very good article (IMHO) about the true nature of this tax evasion issue.

money-offshore-corrupt-democracy-political-influenced

Then another article about HMRC which again, IMHO, raises more questions about impartiality and just how honestly and in-depth any investigation will be conducted.

hmrc-chief-partner-law-firm-offshore-fund

Then we see dave rushing in, yet again to take total control back, without any thought to this - just push push bully push to get his own way to deflect any more probling questions about what he is hiding.

New tax laws

and lets get the pot stirring on the EU debate to focus the attention away with a bit of moral bribery because he is so sure he's going to win the referendum - well, of course when he can just spend £9m on promoting opinions as facts, how can he lose

david-cameron-eu-referendum-boris-johnson-michael-gove

Another view on the whole issue of misuse of wealth and off shore havens and the wider damaging effect they have

the-guardian-view-on-david-cameron-the-warping-ways-of-wealth

And then finally - words fail me - almost

universal-credit-cuts-to-lose-low-income-families-up-to-200-a-month

"Ministers have said households affected by the changes could work extra hours to make up the difference...."

When many have had their hours cut because of the introduction of the NLW?

Analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) estimates that families with a sole earner working full-time on the “national living wage” of £7.20 an hour would have to work a 13-month year to compensate for the cuts, and a full-time single parent would have to work a 14-month year.

But hey, as long as it saves the Treasury money and dave can continue to hide the true extent of just how much he's been able to manipulate the tax loopholes to his ever increasing advantage, that's ok, isn't it.

About time the pig started to bite back - IMHO!