Minority points of view are quite entitled to voice their opinion but I and most others don't see why a minority should attempt to dictate their terms to the rest of us.

When it comes down to it, there are only two "sides" to an argument otherwise you end up arguing on several fronts and agreement becomes either "watered down" or impossible.

What happens is that the disaffected get the hump and shuffle off muttering to the likewise disaffected and disagreeable who then all go off and form their own little group of agitators.

In the end, the different factions continue to argue 'till the cows come home and nothing gets done.

If the proponents of PR got their way, there'd be some weird coalitions getting together all "fighting" for "their way" and like many committees, the only positive thing agreed in the end is when to hold the next meeting.