@upthecreekyetagain wrote:
Again you are missing the point - OP thought it was an intruder behind that door - that was the verdict of the court and why it was not murder.
On that basis it didn't matter who was actually behind the door - the court decided he acted recklessly causing the death of another. It would have been the same offence if it had have been an intruder in the bathroom.
I'm not missing the point. I don't agree that it is the same offence.
