- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
16-10-2014 9:54 PM
@evoman3957 wrote:it's also open to a free for all by anybody and everybody who wants to come here for treatment. So it needs to be sorted out, because the way it's going it won't survive.
"Health Tourism" doesn't really touch the sides of the overall NHS budget:
"To put these numbers in context, whether we are referring to £200 million (CCI’s estimate), £20 million (the Government’s official estimate) or £45 million (a figure calculated on the basis of the Government’s internal analysis), we’re talking about no more than 0.15% of the NHS’s overall budget of £104 billion."
https://fullfact.org/factchecks/cost_of_health_tourism_to_the_nhs-28866
."..What did come as a surprise, however, was another group of NHS users who should be paying for treatment, and that’s British expats.
While small in number – the figures the Department of Health uses assumes there may be 65,000 present in England on an average day – they cost health services more per head than anyone else.
Expats, this report suggests, cost £1,449 per head. Visitors here from outside the EEA who’ve been here for less than three months cost £1,000 less, at £449 per head.
Students from outside the EEA cost £713 per head, and migrants who’ve been here more than a year who have come from outside Europe cost £822 per head.
The expat cost is highest because their age tends to be greatest, and they therefore tend to require more complicated and lengthy healthcare."
http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/foreign-visitors-owe-nhs-2bn-factcheck/16194