A true example of the missing link would be remains of creatures at different stages of a change ie. gills in different stages of change through to turning into lungs. Something that has never been found or ever will be.

Ah, the old lack of transitional fossils argument pops up again.

Unfortunately for the ignorant there are large numbers of transitional forms available for any one to see, in reality every group of living things on the planet is a transitional form moving from one to another, only the vast period of time required prevents it being obvious.

This creature in my opinion backs up the creation theory and not evolution in as much as God made each to its own kind ie a fish a fish, a frog a frog. etc

Then what was Tiktaalik? http://dinosaurs.about.com/od/tetrapodsandamphibians/p/tiktaalik.htm, incidentally the use of the word 'kind' is a biblical invention and not a scientific term.

However if you really want to learn something about evolution, which might be a good idea if you are going to criticise it, I would recommend this site, there you will find a complete refutation of your argument with examples.

http://www.talkorigins.org/

As I said before, don't blindly follow what your elders tell you, they have an agenda and it isn't for your benefit, learn for yourself, ignorance is not bliss.