Remarkable that a casual comment about Webb should generate such a reaction amongst a few .

There have been many threads about numerous people on here, instantly judged, instantly sentenced, usually with little to no evidence offered, and often by the same critics, using the same media.

Now it's those making accusations against celebs who are instantly judged to be criminals, on the basis of, well;.... no evidence at all

So no hypocrisy there then.

Some of the public seem to adore and identify with their celebs, who simply must all be innocent!

Ignoring Harris, Hall, Ovenden, Watkins etc naturally.

Seems the whole judicial process is evaluated by reference to a few celeb cases alone.

The lengths some will go to, to preserve their TV history.

Fixed compensation sums - eh? gem methinks.

What you read in the Daily Blurb is down to it's proprietor in general.If you don't like it, don't read it, because they are unlikely to change if you don't. But I doubt that will happen, because where else would stories of other non-celebs emanate from, to instantly pronounce upon?