@saasher2012 wrote:
Yes I did see that! But whatever the definition& spelling doesn't preclude any right minded person from knowing it is oh sooooo wrong!
Absolutely, but to suggest someone with a sexual attraction for post-pubescent children is the same as someone attracted to prepubescent children is also wrong!
If a school teacher had a sexual encounter with a 16 year old pupil they would be guilty of breaking the law that prevents them from taking advatage of a position of responsibility. If the pupil was 15 they would also be guilty of having sex with a minor, but neither of these are acts of paedophilia. However the headlines in the papers and the mobs on the street would be shouting 'Paedophile', because it makes headlines, rouses emotions and people don't know what they're talking about! I get fed-up of such ignorance!
